Re: Firefox Worked Slowly...
Nick Holland [n...@holland-consulting.net] wrote: > > get a faster processor and more memory. > I don't care what you have...you need a faster processor and more memory > for modern browsers. > > When the browser claims it is 10% faster than before, that's on a > processor that's twice as fast. That's a cynical exaggeration, but not > as big an exaggeration as I wish it was. > Well JIT was disabled on Firefox, but even before that happened, something has made firefox glacially slow on all of my workstations. > I'm really stunned at how much processor memory the modern browser > leaks, considering we once used browsers on 486s with 16M RAM. > Probably Moasic, Netscape would have been too slow with Javascript support to do anything useful...Kind of like firefox today (and thousands of MHz later) Chris
Re: Firefox Worked Slowly...
On 11/02/15 03:47, Mohammad BadieZadegan wrote: > Hi everybody, > I was installed OpenBSD on many Servers that have more CPU types but on > every of them while I worked with firefox it handle websites very slowly! > My Network bandwiths is not bad. > Is that Firefox needs some special configure on OpenBSD? > Or The better way is using another browser such as midori? > What can I do? > Regards. > get a faster processor and more memory. I don't care what you have...you need a faster processor and more memory for modern browsers. When the browser claims it is 10% faster than before, that's on a processor that's twice as fast. That's a cynical exaggeration, but not as big an exaggeration as I wish it was. I'm really stunned at how much processor memory the modern browser leaks, considering we once used browsers on 486s with 16M RAM. Nick.
Re: Firefox Worked Slowly...
On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 12:17:44PM +0330, Mohammad BadieZadegan wrote: > I was installed OpenBSD on many Servers that have more CPU types but on > every of them while I worked with firefox it handle websites very slowly! > My Network bandwiths is not bad. > Is that Firefox needs some special configure on OpenBSD? > Or The better way is using another browser such as midori? > What can I do? I was going to say, don't run resource hungry browsers on your servers, but that aside, modern browsers are resource hungry beasts, and for them to run comfortably, you may need to adjust some of the rather conservatively set resource limits upwards. Some relevant, possiby suboptimal choices but of the WorkedForMe(TM) kind, see http://home.nuug.no/~peter/transition/eurobsdcon2014/desktop.html and the following slide. -- Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/ "Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic" delilah spamd[29949]: 85.152.224.147: disconnected after 42673 seconds.
Re: Firefox Worked Slowly...
On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 08:47:44AM GMT, Mohammad BadieZadegan wrote: > Hi everybody, Hi Mohammad, > I was installed OpenBSD on many Servers that have more CPU types but on > every of them while I worked with firefox it handle websites very slowly! > My Network bandwiths is not bad. > Is that Firefox needs some special configure on OpenBSD? > Or The better way is using another browser such as midori? > What can I do? You can start with sending which versions of both OpenBSD and Firefox you are running. If it's -current, then it _might_ be related to recent W^X changes[0]. Regards, Raf [0] https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports=144498530102271
Re: Firefox Worked Slowly...
Hi, Try seamonkey and chrome see if you are getting same result or they are working smooth? also check with ulimit .. otherwise midori is good alternative. On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Mohammad BadieZadeganwrote: > Hi everybody, > I was installed OpenBSD on many Servers that have more CPU types but on > every of them while I worked with firefox it handle websites very slowly! > My Network bandwiths is not bad. > Is that Firefox needs some special configure on OpenBSD? > Or The better way is using another browser such as midori? > What can I do? > Regards.