Re: OT: protonmail mail body

On 2017-07-20, Rupert Gallagher wrote: > If you make business in Europe, or with people in Europe, then you know about > legal compliance with the Commision's standards, and their pdf and p7m signed > attachments. Similar standards exist in other countries, and they use

Re: OT: protonmail mail body

Rupert Gallagher writes: > If you make business in Europe, or with people in Europe, then you > know about legal compliance with the Commision's standards, and their > pdf and p7m signed attachments. Similar standards exist in other > countries, and they use mime parts. If

Re: OT: protonmail mail body

If you make business in Europe, or with people in Europe, then you know about legal compliance with the Commision's standards, and their pdf and p7m signed attachments. Similar standards exist in other countries, and they use mime parts. If your email client cannot read mime parts, you are out

Re: OT: protonmail mail body

On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 02:46:02AM -0400, Rupert Gallagher wrote: | Out of curiosity, I just checked what all the fuss is about. It turns out that someone reads mail with a non-RFC compliant client, and thus fails to read mime parts. Screw it, update your client. | The other problem seemed to be

Re: OT: protonmail mail body

Out of curiosity, I just checked what all the fuss is about. It turns out that someone reads mail with a non-RFC compliant client, and thus fails to read mime parts. Screw it, update your client. The other problem seemed to be with the list archive. It turns out that at least one archive has no

Re: OT: protonmail mail body

On 18 July 2017 at 09:29, Eric Johnson wrote: > > On Wed, 12 Jul 2017, Mihai Popescu wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I preffer to keep it calm, but some people on the list are using >> protonmail and their mails are impossible to read directly on the >> list. I think they are

Re: OT: protonmail mail body

> As things stand, ProtonMail is not a suitable client for writing to this > mailing list. > > Your messages are nearly unreadable. Maybe it should be blocked. Then the users there can tell them to fix it. Would have no downside for me.

Re: OT: protonmail mail body

> On Wed, 12 Jul 2017, Mihai Popescu wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I preffer to keep it calm, but some people on the list are using > > protonmail and their mails are impossible to read directly on the > > list. I think they are destroying the list, maybe they should turn > > that feature off. Here

Re: OT: protonmail mail body

On Wed, 12 Jul 2017, Mihai Popescu wrote: > Hello, > > I preffer to keep it calm, but some people on the list are using > protonmail and their mails are impossible to read directly on the > list. I think they are destroying the list, maybe they should turn > that feature off. Here is what I see

Re: OT: protonmail mail body

On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 10:09:11AM +0200, Alarig Le Lay wrote: > Hello, > > It's just Base64 Content-Transfer-Encoding, and it's part of rfc2045. > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2045#section-6.8 > > So, the problem is on marc.info side. Moreover, it's working on > mutt and on mail-archive: >

Re: OT: protonmail mail body

On 12 July 2017 at 00:37, Mihai Popescu wrote: > Hello, > > I preffer to keep it calm, but some people on the list are using > protonmail and their mails are impossible to read directly on the > list. I think they are destroying the list, maybe they should turn > that feature

Re: OT: protonmail mail body

On 2017-07-12, Rupert Gallagher wrote: > I top post deliberately, out of sympathy. When you will be as old as I am, > you will find that scrolling a long thread to read a reply it pains your > hand. So, to avoid top posting, you have to scroll twice: to read, and to >

Re: OT: protonmail mail body

On Wed, 12 Jul 2017, Rupert Gallagher wrote: > I top post deliberately, out of sympathy. When you will be as old as I > am, you will find that scrolling a long thread to read a reply it > pains your hand. So, to avoid top posting, you have to scroll twice: > to read, and to

Re: OT: protonmail mail body

I top post deliberately, out of sympathy. When you will be as old as I am, you will find that scrolling a long thread to read a reply it pains your hand. So, to avoid top posting, you have to scroll twice: to read, and to write. I people top post by default, it would make things easier to

Re: OT: protonmail mail body

On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 11:53 AM, Rupert Gallagher wrote: > Can you read me? > > Sent from ProtonMail Mobile Yes, I can read what you wrote, but on Gmail only. I didn't know that there is a RFC for this, I thought there is a feature offered by protonmail. Bytheway, they look

Re: OT: protonmail mail body

On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 04:54:24AM -0400, Rupert Gallagher wrote: > +1 Alright, the base64 transfer encoding thing is in the RFC... However, nowhere does the RFC specify that you should top-post and strip all the newlines: > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Alarig Le Lay

Re: OT: protonmail mail body

+1 On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Alarig Le Lay wrote: > On mer. 12 juil. 10:37:59 2017, Mihai Popescu wrote: > Hello, > > I preffer > to keep it calm, but some people on the list are using > protonmail and their > mails are impossible to read directly on the > list.

Re: OT: protonmail mail body

Can you read me? Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 9:37 AM, Mihai Popescu wrote: > Hello, I preffer to keep it calm, but some people on the list are using > protonmail and their mails are impossible to read directly on the list. I > think they are

Re: OT: protonmail mail body

On mer. 12 juil. 10:37:59 2017, Mihai Popescu wrote: > Hello, > > I preffer to keep it calm, but some people on the list are using > protonmail and their mails are impossible to read directly on the > list. I think they are destroying the list, maybe they should turn > that feature off. Here is