Another feature to look for is spin down of the dedicated hot spare.
Go Vikings :)
Patrick
> On Feb 21, 2016, at 7:23 AM, Marcus MERIGHI wrote:
>
> ti...@openmailbox.org (Tinker), 2016.02.20 (Sat) 21:05 (CET):
>> So glad to understand better what's in the box.
>>
>> Also
ti...@openmailbox.org (Tinker), 2016.02.20 (Sat) 21:05 (CET):
> So glad to understand better what's in the box.
>
> Also please note that I'm not trying to suggest to implement lots of
> crap, am perfectly clear that high security is correlated with low
> complexity.
>
> On 2016-02-21 00:29,
On 20 February 2016 at 14:29, Tinker wrote:
[..]
> On 2016-02-21 04:39, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
[..]
>> When you do http://mdoc.su/o/newfs.8, it does not write to every
>> sector of the underlying partition; thus you cannot expect all sectors
>> to be the same.
>
>
>
On 2016-02-21 05:05, Karel Gardas wrote:
The RAID 1 discipline does not initialize the mirror upon
creation. This is by design because all sectors that are read are
written first. There is no point in wasting a lot of time syncing
random data.
I'm afraid the claim "all sectors that are read
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 8:44 PM, Constantine A. Murenin
wrote:
>
> Scrub cannot possibly be supported due to the design of the softraid:
>
> http://mdoc.su/o/softraid.4
>
> The RAID 1 discipline does not initialize the mirror upon creation. This
> is by design because
On 20 February 2016 at 12:23, Tinker wrote:
>
> On 2016-02-21 01:29, Karel Gardas wrote:
>>
>> scrub is IIRC not supported by any softraid yet.
>
>
> But there's "patrol"!
>
> "bioctl -t start mysoftraid"
[...]
> On 2016-02-21 02:44, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
>>
>> On
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 9:23 PM, Tinker wrote:
>
> On 2016-02-21 01:29, Karel Gardas wrote:
>>
>> scrub is IIRC not supported by any softraid yet.
>
>
> But there's "patrol"!
>
> "bioctl -t start mysoftraid"
bioctl also supports hardware raid cards besides softraid, so
On 2016-02-21 01:29, Karel Gardas wrote:
scrub is IIRC not supported by any softraid yet.
But there's "patrol"!
"bioctl -t start mysoftraid"
Rebuild by all which support redundancy.
Yey! Clarified by Marcus & looking forward to his clarification
Marcus recommendation to read man pages
Marcus,
Holy moly, that is beautiful.
So glad to understand better what's in the box.
Also please note that I'm not trying to suggest to implement lots of
crap, am perfectly clear that high security is correlated with low
complexity.
On 2016-02-21 00:29, Marcus MERIGHI wrote:
On 20 February 2016 at 10:29, Karel Gardas wrote:
> scrub is IIRC not supported by any softraid yet. Rebuild by all which
> support redundancy. Marcus recommendation to read man pages can just
> be highlighted here. Otherwise just read the code for ultimate
> reference of what
scrub is IIRC not supported by any softraid yet. Rebuild by all which
support redundancy. Marcus recommendation to read man pages can just
be highlighted here. Otherwise just read the code for ultimate
reference of what is or is not done.
ti...@openmailbox.org (Tinker), 2016.02.20 (Sat) 16:43 (CET):
> On 2016-02-20 22:23, Marcus MERIGHI wrote:
> >ti...@openmailbox.org (Tinker), 2016.02.20 (Sat) 15:29 (CET):
> >>This email is an attempt to get some knowledge on how softraid works.
> >
> >So many of your questions are answered if you
On 2016-02-20 22:23, Marcus MERIGHI wrote:
ti...@openmailbox.org (Tinker), 2016.02.20 (Sat) 15:29 (CET):
This email is an attempt to get some knowledge on how softraid works.
So many of your questions are answered if you start with bioctl(8)[1],
and continue with softraid(4)[2]. Maybe
ti...@openmailbox.org (Tinker), 2016.02.20 (Sat) 15:29 (CET):
> This email is an attempt to get some knowledge on how softraid works.
So many of your questions are answered if you start with bioctl(8)[1],
and continue with softraid(4)[2]. Maybe bio(4)[3] helps, too.
What's there is usually
14 matches
Mail list logo