>
>
>
> 7 vmx "phys" ifs
> 3 em "phys" ifs
>
Are these 7 ports to vswitches and 3 pci-passthroughed physical ports? I
have had good luck passing physical nics into OpenBSD vms (running line
rate, on 1Gb, and getting close to 2Gb on 2.5 realteks) but em emulated
nics never keep up with their vmx
systat tells me
One box:
89450
IPKTS
19438
OPKTS
The other:
68814
IPKTS
On 2023-02-15, Lars Bonnesen wrote:
> lbo@PLOSLOL2VPN:/etc$ pfctl -s info
> Status: Enabled for 0 days 00:06:49 Debug: err
>
> State Table Total Rate
> current entries 149331
> half-open tcp 5333
>
I think that I am now hitting a bottleneck somewhere else.
Thanks for the help so far... I might come back thirsty for more later...
(-:
Regards, Lars.
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 4:13 PM Lars Bonnesen
wrote:
> lbo@PLOSLOL2VPN:/etc$ pfctl -s info
> Status: Enabled for 0 days 00:06:49
lbo@PLOSLOL2VPN:/etc$ pfctl -s info
Status: Enabled for 0 days 00:06:49 Debug: err
State Table Total Rate
current entries 149331
half-open tcp 5333
searches 4462647255
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 01:01:10PM -, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2023-02-15, Lars Bonnesen wrote:
> > One says:
> >
> > # pfctl -s info
> > Status: Enabled for 0 days 10:56:43 Debug: err
> >
> > State Table Total Rate
> > current entries
As for performance optimization, I think the direction is good, and perhaps
you could go even further if you have a load balancing device that can
distribute the traffic among the multiple VMs.
Not sure why reducing the memory should help. Also reducing the number of
virtual CPUs has probably
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 01:39:54PM +0100, Lars Bonnesen wrote:
> One says:
>
> # pfctl -s info
> Status: Enabled for 0 days 10:56:43 Debug: err
>
> State Table Total Rate
> current entries91680
> half-open tcp
On 2023-02-15, Lars Bonnesen wrote:
> One says:
>
> # pfctl -s info
> Status: Enabled for 0 days 10:56:43 Debug: err
>
> State Table Total Rate
> current entries91680
Lots of entries, close to the default:
$ doas pfctl -sm
On 2/15/23 04:54, Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 10:28:57AM +0100, Gábor LENCSE wrote:
Hi Lars,
> I downscaled from 8 to 4 vCPUs and from 8 to 4 gig RAM - and the two obsd
> now seems to hold the packages decently.
As for performance optimization, I think the direction is good,
One says:
# pfctl -s info
Status: Enabled for 0 days 10:56:43 Debug: err
State Table Total Rate
current entries91680
half-open tcp 4032
searches 313230429479494.1/s
On 15.2.2023. 10:28, Gábor LENCSE wrote:
> In OpenBSD, the packet forwarding happens single threaded, so the
> performance of your system does not benefit much from the 4 cores.
Hi,
actually if forwarding is single threaded of not, depends of what nic do
you have in box. ix,mcx,bnxt,igc,vmx and
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 10:28:57AM +0100, Gábor LENCSE wrote:
> Hi Lars,
>
> > I downscaled from 8 to 4 vCPUs and from 8 to 4 gig RAM - and the two obsd
> > now seems to hold the packages decently.
>
> As for performance optimization, I think the direction is good, and perhaps
> you could go
Hi Lars,
I downscaled from 8 to 4 vCPUs and from 8 to 4 gig RAM - and the two obsd
now seems to hold the packages decently.
As for performance optimization, I think the direction is good, and
perhaps you could go even further if you have a load balancing device
that can distribute the
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 11:04:57PM +0100, Lars Bonnesen wrote:
> What can be done to optimize obsd 7.2 running on top of ESXi 7 with
>
> 7 vmx "phys" ifs
> 3 em "phys" ifs
> 22 virtual ifs
>
> Very simply pf ruleset - the box is only running VPN solution between two
> sites up against a similar
15 matches
Mail list logo
