On 9/3/20 5:41 PM, Ernest Stewart wrote:
> And which pf rules and how to establish those routing tables are exactly what
> I'm asking.
Maybe if you share the output of the ping test from your original mail
we could see what is actually happening.
>From your setup I would assume that the IP
> On Sep 3, 2020, at 12:38 PM, Brian Brombacher wrote:
>
>
>
On Sep 3, 2020, at 12:15 PM, Ernest Stewart
wrote:
>>> Theo de Raadt wrote:
>>> Oh my. Have you considered hiring a consultant?
>>>
>>> Of course. As you have already noticed, I have no idea about how to do what
>> On Sep 3, 2020, at 12:15 PM, Ernest Stewart
>> wrote:
> Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Oh my. Have you considered hiring a consultant?
>
> Of course. As you have already noticed, I have no idea about how to do what
> I'm trying to do. But a consultant is out of my budget.
>
> Are you guys
> On Sep 3, 2020, at 11:44 AM, Ernest Stewart
> wrote:
>
> On Sep 3, 2020, at 15:07 AM, Brian Brombacher wrote:
>
> "Your setup ... requires pf \rules and additional routing tables to make this
> work."
>
> And which pf rules and how to establish those routing tables are exactly what
Theo de Raadt wrote:
Oh my. Have you considered hiring a consultant?
Of course. As you have already noticed, I have no idea about how to do what I'm
trying to do. But a consultant is out of my budget.
Are you guys saying all I have to do is the following, and packets will
automatically be
Ernest Stewart wrote:
> You guys are focusing on the netmasks. Let's consider my setup again
> BUT with all netmasks at 0x, so all the forwarding and routing
> need to be explicitly configured.
Oh my. Have you considered hiring a consultant?
You guys are focusing on the netmasks. Let's consider my setup again BUT with
all netmasks at 0x, so all the forwarding and routing need to be
explicitly configured.
On Sep 3, 2020, at 15:07 AM, Brian Brombacher wrote:
"Your setup ... requires pf \rules and additional routing tables to make this
work."
And which pf rules and how to establish those routing tables are exactly what
I'm asking.
But ok, let's say I reassign addresses so Comp1 re1=
> On Sep 3, 2020, at 11:02 AM, Ernest Stewart
> wrote:
>
> I forgot to say, in every computer I have /etc/sysctl.conf with
> "net.inet.ip.forwarding=1".
>
> And I insist, what shocks me the most is that tcpdump shows in both computers
> the right icmp packets but ping says 100% packets
Den tors 3 sep. 2020 kl 17:01 skrev Ernest Stewart <
erneststewar...@hotmail.com>:
> I forgot to say, in every computer I have /etc/sysctl.conf with
> "net.inet.ip.forwarding=1".
>
> And I insist, what shocks me the most is that tcpdump shows in both
> computers the right icmp packets but ping
Den tors 3 sep. 2020 kl 14:55 skrev Ernest Stewart <
erneststewar...@hotmail.com>:
> I was actually wondering about using netmask 0x for the external
> interface. As you noted, they are different networks, I just wanted to be
> able to use any 192.168/16 ip address in the internal network
I forgot to say, in every computer I have /etc/sysctl.conf with
"net.inet.ip.forwarding=1".
And I insist, what shocks me the most is that tcpdump shows in both computers
the right icmp packets but ping says 100% packets lost.
>1) Why is this little test not working?
>
>2) How should I configure pf.conf (and maybe rc.conf.local with route
>commands) to allow computers >communicate with each other (including Computer1
>with Computer5, thru Computer2)? In every information I >have found this is
>automatically done with
I was actually wondering about using netmask 0x for the external
interface. As you noted, they are different networks, I just wanted to be able
to use any 192.168/16 ip address in the internal network and use nat-to and
rdr-to in Computer1 so every packet going to or from the ISP router
Den tors 3 sep. 2020 kl 11:39 skrev Ernest Stewart <
erneststewar...@hotmail.com>:
> I have a local network with 5 computers:
>
> computer1)
> /etc/hostname.re0: 192.168.1.10 0xff00
>
Different netmask here?
> /etc/hostname.re1: 192.168.2.11 0x
> /etc/hostname.re2: 192.168.2.12
15 matches
Mail list logo
