Re: compared filesystem performance, was Re: 10GBit network performance on OpenBSD 6.4

2019-04-09 Thread Anatoli
red filesystem performance, was Re: 10GBit network performance on OpenBSD 6.4 gwes [g...@oat.com] wrote: That doesn't answer the question: if you say dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda (linux) /dev/rsd0c (bsd) bs=64k count=100 what transfer rate is reported totally agree, Anatoli could you please comp

Re: compared filesystem performance, was Re: 10GBit network performance on OpenBSD 6.4

2019-04-09 Thread Chris Cappuccio
gwes [g...@oat.com] wrote: > > That doesn't answer the question: if you say > dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda (linux) /dev/rsd0c (bsd) bs=64k count=100 > what transfer rate is reported > totally agree, Anatoli could you please compare ? > That number represents the maximum possible long-term

Re: compared filesystem performance, was Re: 10GBit network performance on OpenBSD 6.4

2019-04-08 Thread gwes
On 04/08/19 19:29, Chris Cappuccio wrote: gwes [g...@oat.com] wrote: What is the rated transfer rate of the SSD you're using to test? SATA 3 wire speed is 6G/sec and realistically 500MB/sec raw rate is near the top. Anything over that is an artefact probably from a cache somewhere. He's

Re: compared filesystem performance, was Re: 10GBit network performance on OpenBSD 6.4

2019-04-08 Thread Chris Cappuccio
gwes [g...@oat.com] wrote: > > What is the rated transfer rate of the SSD you're using to test? > SATA 3 wire speed is 6G/sec and realistically 500MB/sec raw rate > is near the top. > > Anything over that is an artefact probably from a cache somewhere. > He's using NVMe with its own DRAM