Re: FCrDNS check implemented

2018-12-20 Thread Aham Brahmasmi
Monsieur Gilles, > helo misc@, > > I wrote an article a few days ago: > > https://poolp.org/posts/2018-12-06/opensmtpd-proc-filters-fc-rdns/ > > > Since then, I implemented the check-fcrdns builtin filter allowing us to > filter incoming sessions that do not have a valid FCrDNS. > > How

Re: FCrDNS check implemented

2018-12-20 Thread Gilles Chehade
On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 11:31:27AM +0100, Aham Brahmasmi wrote: > Monsieur Gilles, > [...] > > This will result in smtpd replacing the welcome banner with the message, > > then dropping the client connection if they don't have a reverse DNS and > > a matching forward DNS. You can apply the check

Re: Rule to prevent spam from my domain

2018-12-20 Thread Maarten de Vries
On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 at 04:05, Edgar Pettijohn wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 11:37:31PM +, Mik J wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I have wrote rules for my opensmtpd but some spams are passing through. > > > > The ones that I go through have a source like em...@mydomain.org and are > > sent to

Re: FAQ gone?

2018-12-20 Thread Aham Brahmasmi
Hi Gilles, Thank you for your elaborate response. > if someone steps up to do the work, I will happily welcome the FAQ again > but it needs to be someone who commits to that work, not someone that'll > write the pages dump them once and disappear. >From what I understand, the primary

Re: FAQ gone?

2018-12-20 Thread Gilles Chehade
On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 10:13:11AM +0100, Aham Brahmasmi wrote: > Hi Gilles, > Hi, > Thank you for your elaborate response. > > > if someone steps up to do the work, I will happily welcome the FAQ again > > but it needs to be someone who commits to that work, not someone that'll > > write the

Re: Announce: OpenSMTPD 6.4.1 released

2018-12-20 Thread Gilles Chehade
On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 07:07:33PM +1100, Antonino Sidoti wrote: > HI, > > Yes, I do have it. Sorry, I was thinking there will be another release as it > was announce on the 16th December. > No worries. The openbsd tree is our development tree, so you can safely assume that if you're running