Re: How does OpenSMTPD compare to a dedicated high-volume MTA?

2020-10-14 Thread Demi M. Obenour
On 10/14/20 4:01 PM, gil...@poolp.org wrote: > October 9, 2020 1:29 AM, "Demi M. Obenour" wrote: > >> I was looking at the EuroBSDCon 2017 presentation on OpenSMTPD, and I >> was wondering how it differs from the dedicated high-volume MTA that >> wound up being written for the ESP. What are the

Re: Single PR or many smaller PRs?

2020-10-14 Thread gilles
October 14, 2020 11:31 PM, "Demi M. Obenour" wrote: > On 10/14/20 3:18 PM, gil...@poolp.org wrote: > >> October 12, 2020 10:06 PM, "Demi M. Obenour" wrote: >> >>> I created https://github.com/OpenSMTPD/OpenSMTPD/pull/1087, which >>> fixes some bugs and avoids spawning shells when it isn’t

Re: How does OpenSMTPD compare to a dedicated high-volume MTA?

2020-10-14 Thread gilles
October 9, 2020 1:29 AM, "Demi M. Obenour" wrote: > I was looking at the EuroBSDCon 2017 presentation on OpenSMTPD, and I > was wondering how it differs from the dedicated high-volume MTA that > wound up being written for the ESP. What are the features that are > needed for high volume, but

Re: Single PR or many smaller PRs?

2020-10-14 Thread Demi M. Obenour
On 10/14/20 3:18 PM, gil...@poolp.org wrote: > October 12, 2020 10:06 PM, "Demi M. Obenour" wrote: > >> I created https://github.com/OpenSMTPD/OpenSMTPD/pull/1087, which >> fixes some bugs and avoids spawning shells when it isn’t necessary >> to do so. Should I split it up into multiple smaller

Re: How does OpenSMTPD compare to a dedicated high-volume MTA?

2020-10-14 Thread gilles
October 14, 2020 11:05 PM, "Demi M. Obenour" wrote: > On 10/14/20 4:01 PM, gil...@poolp.org wrote: > >> October 9, 2020 1:29 AM, "Demi M. Obenour" wrote: >> >>> I was looking at the EuroBSDCon 2017 presentation on OpenSMTPD, and I >>> was wondering how it differs from the dedicated

Re: Single PR or many smaller PRs?

2020-10-14 Thread Demi M. Obenour
On 10/14/20 7:31 PM, gil...@poolp.org wrote: > October 14, 2020 11:31 PM, "Demi M. Obenour" wrote: >> That makes sense. I will make a separate PR that just has some >> automake fixes. >> > > perfect I filed https://github.com/OpenSMTPD/OpenSMTPD/pull/1093. That’s the biggest diff in the whole

Re: Handling a mail alias for another domain

2020-10-14 Thread Archange
Hi, Le 14/10/2020 à 14:10, Christian Kellermann a écrit : > Dear list, > > I have setup opensmtpd for my domain, say 'example.com' that > has virtual users and a typical spampd / dkim / dovecot setup. > > The current config is here: https://termbin.com/jyfe > > Now I'd like to add handling of

Handling a mail alias for another domain

2020-10-14 Thread Christian Kellermann
Dear list, I have setup opensmtpd for my domain, say 'example.com' that has virtual users and a typical spampd / dkim / dovecot setup. The current config is here: https://termbin.com/jyfe Now I'd like to add handling of another domain, specifically expansion of an alias of that. Say I have an

Re: Handling a mail alias for another domain

2020-10-14 Thread Christian Kellermann
* Archange [201014 15:22]: > Hi, > > Le 14/10/2020 à 14:10, Christian Kellermann a écrit : > > Dear list, > > > > I have setup opensmtpd for my domain, say 'example.com' that > > has virtual users and a typical spampd / dkim / dovecot setup. > > > > The current config is here:

Re: Single PR or many smaller PRs?

2020-10-14 Thread gilles
October 12, 2020 10:06 PM, "Demi M. Obenour" wrote: > I created https://github.com/OpenSMTPD/OpenSMTPD/pull/1087, which > fixes some bugs and avoids spawning shells when it isn’t necessary > to do so. Should I split it up into multiple smaller PRs? Also, > it has only been tested on Linux. >