Re: dkim simple canonicalization

Hi all, Le 07/06/2016 à 09:43, Jason A. Donenfeld a écrit : > Hi Joerg, > > Reading from the RFC http://dkim.org/specs/rfc4871-dkimbase.html I saw this: > > > "Signers SHOULD choose canonicalization algorithms based on the types > of messages they process and their aversion to risk. For example,

Issue #694 – Workaround?

Hi everyone, Being affected by https://github.com/OpenSMTPD/OpenSMTPD/issues/694, I’m asking here if there is any workaround for this. Especially, I’m concerned by the fact some messages in the queue are close to reaching the 4 days limit, and I don’t know what to do. Is there a way to be sure

Re: Can't send mail (but receive OK)

Le 23/01/2017 à 10:40, Andreas Thulin a écrit : > Solved it: My ISP blocks port 25 so I had it working on my VPS in the > US instead. Thanks for your help! > > I still need to send e-mail from my home box, so I'll send a separate > mail about that. No need for another email: your only solution

OpenBSD ML? (Was: can't boot by CD but can boot hard disk on UEFI

Sorry, seems I missed something, but when did this ML turned into OpenBSD support ML? :( This email below is just the last one of several similar ones (i.e. help requests unrelated to OpenSMTPd) during the past weeks… ML configuration issue or mislink in some OpenBSD website? Regards, Bruno

Re: Opensmtpd with multiple certificates

Le 14/05/2017 à 09:59, Mik J a écrit : > Thank you Edgar, > You wrote multiple IP adresses. Does it mean that 1 IP address = 1 > certificate ? > Can't be do 1 IP address = x certificates ? No, you can do 1 IP = x certs, thanks to SNI. I do that, my conf: pki domain1.com certificate

Re: Can't match on tags

Le 14/06/2017 à 15:36, Norman Golisz a écrit : > listen on egress port 10020 tag SPAM_IN > listen on egress port 10023 tag SPAM_OUT (*) > accept tagged SPAM_IN \ > for any \ > relay via smtp://127.0.0.1:10021 > > accept tagged SPAM_OUT \ > for any \ > relay via

Re: How do I only allow relay for authenticated users?

Hi, Le 24/09/2017 à 20:48, Kevin a écrit : > Hi, I just started with OpenSMTPD and I was able to get it up and > running (with Dovecot) in just one day. It's a real pleasure to use > and configure, so thank you! > > My question is: how do I only allow relay for authenticated users? > > #accept

Re: FAQ question

Hi, Le 30/10/2017 à 15:23, Chris Eidem a écrit : > I’m attempting to create a multi-domain opensmtpd+dovecot set up. I have a > question about the FAQ example. In it you have the following line in the > config: > > listen on egress port 587 tls-require pki mail.example.com auth > > and you

Re: 6.0.3p1-2 - messages sent from imap (dovecot) are not passed through dkimproxy

Le 30/07/2018 à 16:44, ѽ҉ᶬḳ℠ a écrit : > Hi, > > Archlinux kernel 4.17.11 and its repo package opensmtpd 6.0.3p1-2 > > messages sent from imap (dovecot) are not passed through dkimproxy > whilst when sending from cli with swaks the dkim signature is added. It > is apparent from the dkimproxy log

Re: 6.0.3p1-2 - messages sent from imap (dovecot) are not passed through dkimproxy

Le 01/08/2018 à 14:17, ѽ҉ᶬḳ℠ a écrit : >>> Having sorted PAM SMTPAUTH the user/client 172.25.120.2 is now treated >>> as  server's local user and filter rules using from local are matched. >>> Thence, amended >>> >>> [ accept from source 172.25.120.2 for any relay via >>> smtp://127.0.0.1:10027 ]

Re: Credentials Table

The passwd option exists actually, but is provided by opensmtpd-extras. And that’s what I use since it allows keeping the same file for opensmtpd and dovecot. Regards, Bruno Le 27 août 2018 09:31:54 GMT+02:00, Antonino Sidoti a écrit : >HI, > >Base on the feedback I am going to use the

Re: Syntax Check Please

Le 01/11/2018 à 10:19, Antonino Sidoti a écrit : > Hi, > > I am planning the changeover to the new OpenSMTPD syntax and would like a > sanity check on the configuration below please? My current (working) > configuration is shown using the syntax for OpenBSD 6.3 plus my version of > new syntax;