Re: [Mixxx-devel] test builds for PRs

2017-03-23 Thread Be
I have been waiting for testers for the new loop controls for over a month: https://github.com/mixxxdj/mixxx/pull/1187 You need to use it with the Deere redesign in https://github.com/mixxxdj/mixxx/pull/940 Refer to the wiki for tips on setting up multiple git worktrees for this: http://mixxx.org/

Re: [Mixxx-devel] test builds for PRs

2017-03-23 Thread Radu Suciu
My mapping PR for the Mixtrack Pro 3 is ready to go and works well with the current master version (tested live several times now) https://github.com/mixxxdj/mixxx/pull/1180 On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Daniel Schürmann wrote: > Hi Markus, > > I am also quite unhappy, that we missed a suita

Re: [Mixxx-devel] test builds for PRs

2017-03-23 Thread Daniel Schürmann
Hi Markus, I am also quite unhappy, that we missed a suitable release date as we have original planed "short after 2.0". Later in September, we had also a very stable alpha version that was suitable for merge. Now we are in a middle of a giant feature creep, polishing skins and controller inte

Re: [Mixxx-devel] test builds for PRs

2017-03-23 Thread Markus Klösges
> We have accumulated a rather large backlog of pull requests that are awaiting review and testing. IMHO it would also be nice to have some more info on release schedules or plans, what could be merged and what is laying around for next alpha. What to focus on, where help is wanted. Maybe GitHu

[Mixxx-devel] test builds for PRs

2017-03-23 Thread Be
We have accumulated a rather large backlog of pull requests that are awaiting review and testing. I wrote a new wiki page and put it on the front page of the wiki to help users get involved with testing: http://mixxx.org/wiki/doku.php/testing To get more testers, it would be helpful to make the

Re: [Mixxx-devel] GSoC proposal review

2017-03-23 Thread Tuukka Pasanen
Hello, First chill. Everyone here doesn't have infinite time to get on things like this. But about proposal I don't think you can do that much in one summer. Four effects ain't going to happen in three months. You should add at least one to make sure you understand Mixxx inner things forehan

Re: [Mixxx-devel] GSoC proposal review

2017-03-23 Thread Nimit Bhardwaj
Please rate it, I want to know did I make the proposal correct, as I first time write the proposal I don't know much if its write On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 11:07 PM, Nimit Bhardwaj wrote: > Please rate my proposal for GSoC this year, I am going to code for the > microphone effects please see it a

Re: [Mixxx-devel] Fwd: Trying to test Bug #1663444 (quantization missbehavior)

2017-03-23 Thread Daniel Schürmann
Hi Anast, are you able to single step though the code using emancs? Once you have a visual gdb debugger, you could probably identify why you test is not failing. I use Eclipse, we have some hints in our Wiki to make it work nice: www.mixxx.org/wiki/doku.php/eclipse There is also an emacs+ plugin

Re: [Mixxx-devel] Fwd: Trying to test Bug #1663444 (quantization missbehavior)

2017-03-23 Thread Anast Gramm
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 09:37:24AM +0100, Daniel Schürmann wrote: > Hi Anast, > > I am not sure, but probably you need an additional > ProcessBuffer(); > after you set play. I'll try it when I get the chance. I still don't get what ProcessBuffer() actually does, even after reading the code! Somet

[Mixxx-devel] Fwd: Trying to test Bug #1663444 (quantization missbehavior)

2017-03-23 Thread Daniel Schürmann
Hi Anast, I am not sure, but probably you need an additional ProcessBuffer(); after you set play. Are you able to debug though the Mixxx source? Which IDE do you use on which OS? By the way: If you like to discuss source code, it is straight forward to issue a GitHub pull request. You can just w