Unfortunately, it looks like we will never switch to qmake, especially
since the build servers are setup to use it. Qtcreator has some support for
SCons already, http://scons.org/wiki/IDEIntegration#Qt_Creator, so there
seems to be little benefit to the switch.
Of course you can always use it if y
I finally built Fedora RPMs for all of Mixxx's dependencies, got them to pass
rpmlint/mock/fedora-review, and even submitted a few
package-requests, so they might actually end up in Fedora's repos.
Until then, here's a github repo containing all the files you'll need to turn
Fedora Core's stan
If you do that, I'll be glad to put my cmake knowledge to good use by reviewing
your work.
From: Tuukka Pasanen
To: mixxx-devel
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 10:49 PM
Subject: Re: [Mixxx-devel] Building Mixxx with MinGW on a Linux machine
Hello,
*Cc:* mixxx-devel mailto:mixxx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>>
*Sent:* Monday, May 20, 2013 11:23 AM
*Subject:* Re: [Mixxx-devel] Building Mixxx with MinGW on a
Linux machine
Hi Tuukka,
my vote is for cmake, The KDE guys have made good experience
-
>> *From:* Daniel Schürmann
>> *To:* Tuukka Pasanen
>> *Cc:* mixxx-devel
>> *Sent:* Monday, May 20, 2013 11:23 AM
>>
>> *Subject:* Re: [Mixxx-devel] Building Mixxx with MinGW on a Linux machine
>>
>> Hi Tuukka,
>>
>> my vote is for c
gh benefits.
> Also...real life is threatening to intrude any day now :-)
>
> Steven Boswell
>
> --
> *From:* Daniel Schürmann
> *To:* Tuukka Pasanen
> *Cc:* mixxx-devel
> *Sent:* Monday, May 20, 2013 11:23 AM
>
> *Subject:* Re: [Mixxx
To: Tuukka Pasanen
Cc: mixxx-devel
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 11:23 AM
Subject: Re: [Mixxx-devel] Building Mixxx with MinGW on a Linux machine
Hi Tuukka,
my vote is for cmake, The KDE guys have made good experience with it. But I
think this is a lot of work to migrate to cmake.
I would be happy
Hi Tuukka,
my vote is for cmake, The KDE guys have made good experience with it. But I
think this is a lot of work to migrate to cmake.
I would be happy if someone picks up that task. Scons is so slow.
Kind regards,
Daniel
2013/5/20 Tuukka Pasanen
> Hello,
> openSUSE also have good mingw su
control and hid in
the MinGW build!
Steven Boswell
From: Tuukka Pasanen
To: mixxx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 4:27 AM
Subject: Re: [Mixxx-devel] Building Mixxx with MinGW on a Linux machine
Hello,
openSUSE also have good mingw s
Hello,
openSUSE also have good mingw support and rpms. I see if I have time to
play with this.
Is it possible to get rid of scons and get this qmake for 1.12? It would
be nice just to have pure QT building system.
Thanks,
Tuukka
On 18.05.2013 23:08, Steven Boswell II wrote:
After building an
After building an MS Windows installer for Mixxx using the standard
instructions, I decided to try getting it to work with MinGW running under
Linux.
The branch at lp:~ulatekh/mixxx/mingw is the result of my work so far.
The qmake version (i.e. build/qtcreator/mixxx.pro) is a bit clunky, but can
11 matches
Mail list logo
