Hi Chris,
Thanks for writing your review and for following up on this with us.
Replies inline below:
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 20:55 -0400, Chris Everest wrote:
> >It sounds like the guy either doesn't understand or doesn't need/want
> >the features Mixxx brings to the table. I think Xwax would be a
>It sounds like the guy either doesn't understand or doesn't need/want
>the features Mixxx brings to the table. I think Xwax would be a better
>fit for his preferences. (I tried to post a comment to this effect in a
>response to his blog but it didn't show up.)
This is a really late reply... but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Looks like it's time to open a "they talk about mixxx" section on the
new website, isn't it ? ;)
Big ups to everyone in the team for that incredible release !
Keep it up !
j
Ronald Stewart wrote:
>>From a guy who has been spinning and making wa
Hi there.
It sounds like the guy either doesn't understand or doesn't need/want
the features Mixxx brings to the table. I think Xwax would be a better
fit for his preferences. (I tried to post a comment to this effect in a
response to his blog but it didn't show up.)
Basically, if you just want t
>From a guy who has been spinning and making wax since he was 17 years
old, and who does not need headphones to beatmix instantly, (just a
monitor and a quarter turn on a 1200 to get on beat) Mixxx is way
cooler than what was discussed in the article...
I have not really ever stood on my soapbox?
Hey guys,
This was linked from Create Digital Music today:
http://vinylproject.com/dp/node/49
Interesting read, coming from a guy who was thinking about switching
from vinyl. I've got some thoughts on this, but I'd like hear other
peoples' first, if anyone would like to share any.
Thanks,
Albert
