It sounds like the guy either doesn't understand or doesn't need/want
the features Mixxx brings to the table. I think Xwax would be a better
fit for his preferences. (I tried to post a comment to this effect in a
response to his blog but it didn't show up.)
This is a really late reply... but
Hi Chris,
Thanks for writing your review and for following up on this with us.
Replies inline below:
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 20:55 -0400, Chris Everest wrote:
It sounds like the guy either doesn't understand or doesn't need/want
the features Mixxx brings to the table. I think Xwax would be a
Hi there.
It sounds like the guy either doesn't understand or doesn't need/want
the features Mixxx brings to the table. I think Xwax would be a better
fit for his preferences. (I tried to post a comment to this effect in a
response to his blog but it didn't show up.)
Basically, if you just want
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Looks like it's time to open a they talk about mixxx section on the
new website, isn't it ? ;)
Big ups to everyone in the team for that incredible release !
Keep it up !
j
Ronald Stewart wrote:
From a guy who has been spinning and making wax
