On Thu, 2003-11-27 at 00:06, Steven M. Schultz wrote:
> Na, you want a bandwidth pig try "-g 1 -G 1" and generate only
> I frames :) Encoding is very fast but the files end up being
> 60% larger than a GOP size of 15 using P frames.
> But I thought you weren't on a bit budget... ;)
Well, i just
On 26 Nov 2003, Florin Andrei wrote:
> So, since we're at "look at the preview release and say what you don't
> like" anyway :-) here's another documentation feature request:
Just a bit late for this one - the next release candidate is
RSN (Real Soon Now). Ronald's probably worki
On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 09:04, Steven M. Schultz wrote:
> On 26 Nov 2003, Florin Andrei wrote:
>
> > Is there any conflict if i use -H and -E simultaneously?
>
> No conflict at all. -E processing is done after the quantization
> tables have been used.
Ah, ok.
So, since we're at "look at the pre
On 26 Nov 2003, Florin Andrei wrote:
> Is there any conflict if i use -H and -E simultaneously?
No conflict at all. -E processing is done after the quantization
tables have been used.
> If not, does it make sense from a logical p.o.v. to use them both?
Makes a lot of
I'm not sure i understand how -E works, so...
Is there any conflict if i use -H and -E simultaneously?
If not, does it make sense from a logical p.o.v. to use them both?
Does -H override -K, or the other way 'round?
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
---
