Re: [Mjpeg-users] Mjpegtools 1.6.2 rc1 (Upgrading!)

2003-08-27 Thread Ronald Bultje
Hey Martin, On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 11:33, Martin Samuelsson wrote: Does this make sense at all? Perfect, I would have proposed the same thing. I don't see any advantage for the current behaviour as default over the old behaviour. I'll apply ... ehm... damn, I'm gone all week ('till monday).

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Weird interlacing -- 3:2 pulldown?

2003-08-27 Thread Scott Bigham
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 08:53:20AM -0700, Steven M. Schultz wrote: On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Scott Bigham wrote: The combing effect is visible with playdv, most clearly on changes of U, I thought the problem was 'juddering' which would indicate a field order problem of some

Re: [Mjpeg-users] mjpeg 1.6.1.90 libjpeg-mmx configure change

2003-08-27 Thread Ronald Bultje
Hey, On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 10:21, Trent Piepho wrote: The help from the configure script no longer lists the --with-jpeg-mmx option, even though it appears to still exist. If the script doesn't guess where jpeg-mmx is, there is no error most users (especially those who don't know to look)

[Mjpeg-users] mpeg2nec in 1.6.1.90 slower - found the answer.

2003-08-27 Thread Ray Cole
I found the answer... This newer version of mpeg2enc forces variable bit rate from what I can tell, whereas the older one did not (I'm not sure if 1.6.1 actually turned variable bit rate on before and I commented it out or if it came that way...but nevertheless I see it commented out in my

Re: [Mjpeg-users] mpeg2nec in 1.6.1.90 slower - found the answer.

2003-08-27 Thread Steven M. Schultz
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Ray Cole wrote: I found the answer... This newer version of mpeg2enc forces variable bit rate from what I can tell, whereas the older one did not (I'm not sure if 1.6.1 actually turned variable bit rate on before and I commented it out or if it came that way...but

Re: [Mjpeg-users] mpeg2nec in 1.6.1.90 slower - found the answer.

2003-08-27 Thread Steffen Barszus
Am Mittwoch, 27. August 2003 06:01 schrieb Steven M. Schultz: Ah, that'll do it - MPlayer does use a lot of cpu (sure seems to use more than Ogle for playing DVDs - at least on my systems). Well I guess this depends on the video card. If mplayer has to rely on X11 output it sure needs

[Mjpeg-users] pipe video _through_ yuvplay?

2003-08-27 Thread Axel Philipsenburg
Hi folks! I was wondering if it is possible to have yuvplay pass the video stream to stdout besides showing the frames in a window? I'd like to see how far my encoding has progressed so I'd like to do something like this: lav2yuv | filter_stuff | yuvplay | mpeg2enc Is that possible? See ya,

Re: [Mjpeg-users] mpeg2nec in 1.6.1.90 slower - found the

2003-08-27 Thread Ray Cole
I've made hundreds of DVDs using the VBR logic and they all play fine on a variety of standalone players ranging from an old Audiovox portable to a Philips (which will play anything it seems). I'm sure it works now, but it's one of those situations where cbr is working

Re: [Mjpeg-users] pipe video _through_ yuvplay?

2003-08-27 Thread Charles Yates
On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 11:50, Axel Philipsenburg wrote: I'd like to see how far my encoding has progressed so I'd like to do something like this: lav2yuv | filter_stuff | yuvplay | mpeg2enc Is that possible? Try: mkfifo play.yuv yuvplay play.yuv lav2yuv | filter_stuff | tee play.yuv |

Re: [Mjpeg-users] pipe video _through_ yuvplay?

2003-08-27 Thread Bernhard Praschinger
Hallo I was wondering if it is possible to have yuvplay pass the video stream to stdout besides showing the frames in a window? I'd like to see how far my encoding has progressed so I'd like to do something like this: lav2yuv | filter_stuff | yuvplay | mpeg2enc Is that possible? If

[Mjpeg-users] lpcm audio?

2003-08-27 Thread Mark Rages
I am having difficulty getting linear PCM audio to work with mplex and mpeg2 files. Is lpcm in mplex working? I need it to make DVDs. I'm using recent CVS of mjpegtools. The audio comes out as noise, similar to endianness trouble, but I've tried both ways. Regards, Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Mjpegtools 1.6.2 rc1 (Upgrading!)

2003-08-27 Thread Bernhard Praschinger
I remember that I have changed that loop option. At least I applied the patch from a user to have that feature. I trie to answer all mails about that topic in one mail. Might aswell. :) Fine. Uh. That would mean cvs access, right? Guess I'll have to wait, then. :) You can get it

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Weird interlacing -- 3:2 pulldown?

2003-08-27 Thread Scott Bigham
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 12:09:03PM -0700, Steven M. Schultz wrote: On Sun, 24 Aug 2003, Scott Bigham wrote: Actually, I'm probably using the 0.2.0 release; I couldn't find any mention of an associated CVS repository. It is a bit hard to track down - try this: :pserver:[EMAIL