[mkgmap-dev] Administrative boundaries

2009-08-03 Thread Lambertus
It appears that very low level administrative boundaries are rendered quite prominently using the default Mkgmap style. An example is shown here: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=31404#p31404 What are the options to reduce the visibility of those boundaries?

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Administrative boundaries

2009-08-03 Thread maning sambale
May I also add, most admin_level boundaries around my area use relations. How do I use a relation style to show admin level boundaries i.e. (or something similar) admin_level = 6-8 resolution 15 admin_level= 10-15 resolution 2o On 8/3/09, Lambertus o...@na1400.info wrote: It appears that very

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Administrative boundaries

2009-08-03 Thread Marco Certelli
--- Lun 3/8/09, maning sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com ha scritto: Da: maning sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com Oggetto: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Administrative boundaries A: Development list for mkgmap mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk Data: Lunedì 3 agosto 2009, 10:44 May I also add, most

Re: [mkgmap-dev] errors in routing

2009-08-03 Thread Garvan maew
garvan.m...@online.com.kh wrote: Quoting Mark Burton ma...@ordern.com: Should now be fixed. Err, that's only for OSM input. For Polish input it's not fixed - you have to fix your data instead. Just make sure that no road is longer than 25Km between nodes. If necessary, add

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Magic highway symbols on Vista CX failing

2009-08-03 Thread Alexander Wittig
Am 02.08.2009 15:16 Uhr schrieb Steve Ratcliffe: I did not. If I do, the symbols appear correctly. I'm not familiar with neither the Garmin encoding nor mkgmap's handling of it, but would it be possible to add the codes for the symbols to the names in a way that they work with both 6bit and

[mkgmap-dev] Apparent bug: POIs from areas

2009-08-03 Thread Dermot McNally
Folks, By accident, I've noticed that when areas are converted to POIs, address and phone number information (and maybe other stuff) does not seem to be preserved. For instance, see here: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/4482136 The maps I create can display address and phone number for

[mkgmap-dev] phone number bug?

2009-08-03 Thread Clifford Nolan
Hello, I use mkgmap to make Garmin maps for my Nuvi 860T gps. I notice that POIs which have only a phone number can be used directly with my bluetooth hands-free phone to call it. However, as soon as there is any address info attached to the POI as well, the phone number appears as follows

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Apparent bug: POIs from areas

2009-08-03 Thread Clinton Gladstone
On Aug 3, 2009, at 20:19, Dermot McNally wrote: By accident, I've noticed that when areas are converted to POIs, address and phone number information (and maybe other stuff) does not seem to be preserved. Hi Dermot, I posted a patch for this a while ago. You should be able to find it in

[mkgmap-dev] Append Name with general rules via style-file

2009-08-03 Thread Felix Hartmann
Some of you have already made patches for the name so maybe you know whether the following would be feasible. Currently add or set name will delete everything and put in the new text. the start-with used by Thilo's patches works AFAIK (I never tried it) also only following highway=* [0x??

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Append Name with general rules via style-file

2009-08-03 Thread Mark Burton
Hi Felix, This is not a comment on your proposed scheme but I do believe that the current handling of name and ref (and the highway shields, etc.) is completely fucked up. IMHO, munging the element name and its refs together in the style file is completely bogus. Cheers, Mark

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Append Name with general rules via style-file

2009-08-03 Thread Felix Hartmann
Yeah that's true, but how to do it better? I would think a name-file where you can run rules for name, info sections , phone numbers, etc. seperate from the style-file would be best. Currently of my lines style-file which consists of 8.000 lines, 7.000 are basically only to get proper naming,

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Administrative boundaries

2009-08-03 Thread maning sambale
Thanks! will try this tonight On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Apollinaris Schoellascho...@gmail.com wrote: don't see a reason why it shouldn't work for a relation for a relation you will need an entry in the relations file to copy tags to the lines and then process the rules for the lines an