On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Torsten Leistikow de_m...@gmx.de wrote:
Moin,
Henning Scholland schrieb am 31.01.2011 21:41:
Why you
would like to have a POI for an object taged as node and not for a
similar POI taged as polygon?
In OSM some objets can be mapped in OSM as a node or as an
Am 03.02.2011 12:51, schrieb Ben Konrath:
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Torsten Leistikowde_m...@gmx.de wrote:
Moin,
Henning Scholland schrieb am 31.01.2011 21:41:
Why you
would like to have a POI for an object taged as node and not for a
similar POI taged as polygon?
In OSM some objets
Ben Konrath schrieb am 03.02.2011 12:51:
That's a bug. If I recall correctly, the POI should only be added if
there's no POI with the same name already in the polygon. I should
really fix this. Thanks for pointing it out.
No, in the OSM data is only a polygon, and AFTER the POI is added to the
Am 03.02.2011 12:51, schrieb Ben Konrath:
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Torsten Leistikowde_m...@gmx.de wrote:
Moin,
Henning Scholland schrieb am 31.01.2011 21:41:
Why you
would like to have a POI for an object taged as node and not for a
similar POI taged as polygon?
In OSM some
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 05:02:43PM +0100, Torsten Leistikow wrote:
For some types this might be ok, but for some types I do not want the
symbol in addition to the polygon.
For some minor map features, I would want only the symbol, not the
polygon. For example, mappers could start drawing bus
Am 03.02.2011 22:36, schrieb Marko Mäkelä:
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 05:02:43PM +0100, Torsten Leistikow wrote:
For some types this might be ok, but for some types I do not want the
symbol in addition to the polygon.
For some minor map features, I would want only the symbol, not the
polygon.
On 04.02.2011 08:12, Henning Scholland wrote:
Am 03.02.2011 22:36, schrieb Marko Mäkelä:
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 05:02:43PM +0100, Torsten Leistikow wrote:
For some types this might be ok, but for some types I do not want the
symbol in addition to the polygon.
For some minor map features, I
Moin,
Henning Scholland schrieb am 31.01.2011 21:41:
Why you
would like to have a POI for an object taged as node and not for a
similar POI taged as polygon?
In OSM some objets can be mapped in OSM as a node or as an area, depending on
the availability of the source data. If they are mapped
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 08:31:09PM +0100, Henning Scholland wrote:
Am 31.01.2011 20:16, schrieb Marko Mäkelä:
On a related note, I believe that an alternative to add-pois-to-areas
should be implemented, by introducing an add_poi action in the polygons
style file. In that way, one could flexibly
Am 31.01.2011 21:20, schrieb Marko Mäkelä:
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 08:31:09PM +0100, Henning Scholland wrote:
Am 31.01.2011 20:16, schrieb Marko Mäkelä:
On a related note, I believe that an alternative to add-pois-to-areas
should be implemented, by introducing an add_poi action in the polygons
10 matches
Mail list logo
