Am 13.10.2010 22:09, schrieb WanMil:
char...@cferrero.net schrieb am 27.09.2010 15:20:
As an example take a nature reserve consisting of a wood with a lake
inside.
This migth be mapped with two polygons and a relation:
polygon A: leisure=nature_reserve (the complete area)
polygon B:
char...@cferrero.net schrieb am 27.09.2010 15:20:
As an example take a nature reserve consisting of a wood with a lake inside.
This migth be mapped with two polygons and a relation:
polygon A: leisure=nature_reserve (the complete area)
polygon B: natural=water (only the inner area)
Torsten Leistikow (de_m...@gmx.de) wrote:
WanMil schrieb am 24.09.2010 19:29:
My understanding of the multipolygons is, that the tags may EITHER be
in the
relation OR on the outer polygons. So the outerpoylgons are only to be
used,
when there are no tags on the relation.
If the relation
char...@cferrero.net schrieb am 27.09.2010 15:20:
As an example take a nature reserve consisting of a wood with a lake inside.
This migth be mapped with two polygons and a relation:
polygon A: leisure=nature_reserve (the complete area)
polygon B: natural=water (only the inner area)
Torsten Leistikow (de_m...@gmx.de) wrote:
char...@cferrero.net schrieb am 27.09.2010 15:20:
As an example take a nature reserve consisting of a wood with a
lake inside.
This migth be mapped with two polygons and a relation:
polygon A: leisure=nature_reserve (the complete area)
polygon B:
char...@cferrero.net schrieb am 27.09.2010 16:49:
OK, but in practical terms if mkgmap generated a nature reserve
polygon, a wood multipolygon and an inner water polygon, wouldn't the
visible results be undefined? In other words, you could end up with
either:
a) Wood multipolygon
WanMil schrieb am 24.09.2010 19:29:
My understanding of the multipolygons is, that the tags may EITHER be
in the
relation OR on the outer polygons. So the outerpoylgons are only to be
used,
when there are no tags on the relation.
If the relation itself is tagged and there is a tag on the
...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
[mailto:mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk] On Behalf Of Markus
Sent: Friday, 24 September 2010 4:00 PM
To: char...@cferrero.net; 'Development list for mkgmap'
Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Trouble getting some multipolygons to render
inmkgmap
Hi Charlie,
The only problem I
On 24/09/2010 10:42, Markus wrote:
The other relations seem to have water reversed also.
For the last relation I would try reversing the swimming pool way and the
outer way to match the coastline way. Although I wouldn't have thought that
this would matter.
Markus_g
For the
Markus,
for mkgmap'
Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Trouble getting some multipolygons to render
inmkgmap
On 24/09/2010 10:42, Markus wrote:
The other relations seem to have water reversed also.
For the last relation I would try reversing the swimming pool way and the
outer way to match the coastline way. Although I
'
Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Trouble getting some multipolygons to render
inmkgmap
On 24/09/2010 10:42, Markus wrote:
The other relations seem to have water reversed also.
For the last relation I would try reversing the swimming pool way and the
outer way to match the coastline way. Although I
with multipolygons.
Regards,
Markus_g
-Original Message-
From: Charlie Ferrero [mailto:char...@cferrero.net]
Sent: Friday, 24 September 2010 4:31 PM
To: Markus
Cc: 'Development list for mkgmap'
Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Trouble getting some multipolygons to render
inmkgmap
On 24/09/2010 10
WanMil schrieb am 24.09.2010 17:35:
The mp code must check if the mp itself contains the
relevant polygon tags or if the tagging should be taken from the outer
ways. For this purpose a list of known polygon tags is used and up to
now leisure is not in this list.
My understanding of the
WanMil schrieb am 24.09.2010 17:35:
The mp code must check if the mp itself contains the
relevant polygon tags or if the tagging should be taken from the outer
ways. For this purpose a list of known polygon tags is used and up to
now leisure is not in this list.
My understanding of the
14 matches
Mail list logo
