> To:
> mkgmap-dev@.org
>> From:
> popej@.onet
>> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 15:07:14 +0200
>> Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] highway=razed
>>
>> Hi Gerd,
>>
>> > I think 1st I wanted to point out that the "mop up" rule
>> >
t; From: po...@poczta.onet.pl
> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 15:07:14 +0200
> Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] highway=razed
>
> Hi Gerd,
>
> > I think 1st I wanted to point out that the "mop up" rule
> > should be removed, it is likely to produce wrong routing.
>
>
Hi Andrzej,
I think 1st I wanted to point out that the "mop up" rule
should be removed, it is likely to produce wrong routing.
I found it because in my area a motorway replaced a primary
road and that primary road is now mapped with highway=razed,
e.g. here
Hi Gerd,
> I think 1st I wanted to point out that the "mop up" rule
> should be removed, it is likely to produce wrong routing.
I doubt it could make a really bad routing, it is nearly the lowest
category of road anyway. As a result IMHO it goes to personal
preferences, whether to use it. Do
Hi all,
the lines file in the default style contains this rule:
# Mop up any unrecognised highway types
highway=* & highway!=proposed & area!=yes [0x07 road_class=0 road_speed=0
resolution 23]
I've changed it to
highway=* & highway!=proposed & area!=yes { echotags "mop up" } [0x07
Hi Gerd,
> Most of these ways are areas, but don't have the area=yes tag.
> I am not sure why the "mop up" rule would ignore them when the
> area=yes tag exists.
I'm not sure if I understand your problem, so following are my
observations only.
Area described as a highway could be a
