Info
i hope, i have correctly changed the Havelberg Islands mapping.
Now the havel-river has two new islands in a multipolygon=riverbank Relation.
i hope it works proper :-)
greetings
ludwich
Am 06.09.2011 um 09:05 schrieb Minko:
Both islands and the riverbank should be part of a
Both islands and the riverbank should be part of a multipolygon relation, not
one big way like here.
The islands have to be tagged as inner member of that relation (without any
further tags) and the riverbank itself is the outer member (without tags).
The whole relation should get the tag
Hello,
I've a problem with a riverbank
(http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=52.82591lon=12.07255zoom=16layers=M)
When looking at my map on the Garmin or Basecamp I can see the islands
(http://img820.imageshack.us/img820/1363/931.png), but when zooming in, they
are
You can download the patched (v2) mkgmap from
http://files.mkgmap.org.uk/download/19/mkgmap.jar
WanMil
Thanks Wanmil, I'd like to test it, but don't know how to use those patches.
Do you have a mkgmap.jar file?
Wanmil wrote:
Minko,
can you please test the patch I've posted?
WanMil
Thanks Wanmil!
Your patch solves the problems with the Albert Canal (water is back).
It also solves another issue with rendering a very large multipolygon farmland
in NW France:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1067268
I have tested it on about 10 tiles in Belgium/N-France/SW NL and
Thanks Wanmil, I'd like to test it, but don't know how to use those patches. Do
you have a mkgmap.jar file?
Wanmil wrote:
Minko,
can you please test the patch I've posted?
WanMil
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
Hi Wanmil,
I've enabled logging and I see now 4 files with mkgmap.log.0, 1, 2 and 3
without any relations in it:
http://mijndev.openstreetmap.nl/~ligfietser/diverse/mkgmap.log.zip
Maybe my logging.properties parameters are not correct?
# The default level FINE, WARNING, INFO, SEVERE
Your logging parameters log too much.
.level=FINE activates all loggers with the maximum log level so your 4
files contain only messages of how the img files are created.
Change the following lines:
.level=SEVERE
java.util.logging.FileHandler.limit=1
This means:
default setting: log
Thanks Wanmil,
I got this message in the log file:
c:\Downloads\Benelux\10010046.osm.gz: Cannot join the following ways to closed
polygons. Multipolygon http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1424029
On my map the Albert canal looks empty, except for the river in the centre. On
the
Ps you can see my tiles here:
http://www.gpsvisualizer.com/display/1305916509-00480-83.85.222.55.html
The areas_bnl.kml and areas_bnl.list area lists are in here:
http://mijndev.openstreetmap.nl/~ligfietser/openfietsmap/Scripts/
___
mkgmap-dev mailing
Thanks for your investigations.
I have an idea.
The automatic closing of polygons only closes single ways but does not
check if the way could be closed by connecting it to another way. This
is a bit tricky and I fear that there might be some side effects. But
possibly it works.
I will try to
Recently someone noticed flooding on the openmtbmap in Belgium south of
Maastricht:
http://forum.gps.nl/viewtopic.php?f=109t=34597p=277200#p277200
I have noticed related issues with floodings west of Maastricht on Lambertus'
maps and on my own Openfietsmap parts of the same Albertcanal are dry.
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 10:33:14AM +0200, Minko wrote:
On places where the tile borders are crossing this multipolygon mkgmap
has problems with rendering (because the ends of the multipolgygon are
way outside the tiles). Splitting up the multipolygon in smaller parts
in osm seems not the way to
I haven't count them ;-) The multipoolygon stretches out on my map along three
tiles (roughly 100km wide). Since this area is mapped quite well, moving the
tiles wont help. And I'm talking about different maps that shows issues there
(with different tiles) so I think it can only be solved by
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 01:57:43PM +0200, Minko wrote:
I haven't count them ;-) The multipoolygon stretches out on my map
along three tiles (roughly 100km wide). Since this area is mapped quite
well, moving the tiles wont help. And I'm talking about different maps
that shows issues there (with
How do I configure this split radius?
I have examined the nodes close to the tile borders, they are within 500 m
outside of the tile borders. I have splitted my maps with an overlap=3000.
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
Am 19.05.2011 16:43, schrieb Minko:
How do I configure this split radius?
I have examined the nodes close to the tile borders, they are within 500 m
outside of the tile borders. I have splitted my maps with an overlap=3000.
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
Recently someone noticed flooding on the openmtbmap in Belgium south of
Maastricht:
http://forum.gps.nl/viewtopic.php?f=109t=34597p=277200#p277200
I have noticed related issues with floodings west of Maastricht on Lambertus'
maps and on my own Openfietsmap parts of the same Albertcanal are
18 matches
Mail list logo
