Am 21.08.2009 um 12:43 schrieb Felix Hartmann:
> Is noone else using these features? Thilo, what about you? Are you
> able to use 1140 as a base?
Hi Felix,
sorry, I didn't see that thread earlier. The feature with the
relations that you are using was never integrated into trunk. I assume
Hi Steve,
> Mark, great work on implementing the extended types.
Thanks, still more goodies to come as I have now moved on to the
encoding of various xtype attributes (depth/height, various colours,
buoy/light types, etc.) Making good progress.
> As for this problem, I don't see it. With a sim
Hi
Mark, great work on implementing the extended types.
As for this problem, I don't see it. With a simple style that
only includes one line type with overlays it works just fine. Same
with relations.
Also looking at the code change, there is nothing that appears to
touch that area of the styli
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Felix
Hartmann wrote:
> routes... ups sorry should have said relations. Anything written to the
> relations file is not enacted anymore.
I was at least able to get some simple items working in the relations
file with r1140, for example the following:
route=railw
Hi Felix,
> Overlays. I mean the overlays file in the style-files. Before 1139 if you
> had a line in your lines file saysing for example:
> highway=footway & highway=cycleway [0x123 resolution 20] you could now
> define in the overlays file 0x123: 0x2a, 0x0c
> and both 0x2a and 0x0c were in
2009/8/21 Mark Burton
>
> Felix,
>
> > No I'm still unable to get routes and overlays to show up on the map.
> >
> > either using 1140 with multiple elements patch (no other patches), nor
> with
> > clean svn version.
>
> That's sad.
>
> I don't know what you mean by routes or overlays so I can't
Felix,
> No I'm still unable to get routes and overlays to show up on the map.
>
> either using 1140 with multiple elements patch (no other patches), nor with
> clean svn version.
That's sad.
I don't know what you mean by routes or overlays so I can't imagine
what the problem is. If you could
2009/8/21 Mark Burton
>
> Hi Felix,
>
> Is this still a problem or did it get better?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Mark
> ___
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>
No I'm still unable to g
Hi Felix,
Is this still a problem or did it get better?
Cheers,
Mark
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
Clinton Gladstone wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Felix
Hartmann wrote:
Could some other people please try out whether the overlays and
relations file still work with 1140?
Could you send an example of what you are doing in your relations
file? I will then see if I can reprodu
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Felix
Hartmann wrote:
> Could some other people please try out whether the overlays and
> relations file still work with 1140?
Could you send an example of what you are doing in your relations
file? I will then see if I can reproduce the problem.
Cheers.
Hi Felix,
> Could some other people please try out whether the overlays and
> relations file still work with 1140?
>
> I have currently the problem that no more routes are visible when
> compiling maps with 1140. Also overlays file seems to have stopped working.
Are you using a stock 1140 or d
Could some other people please try out whether the overlays and
relations file still work with 1140?
I have currently the problem that no more routes are visible when
compiling maps with 1140. Also overlays file seems to have stopped working.
___
mkgma
13 matches
Mail list logo
