Changeset: 2b8bce60ef94
Author:jrose
Date: 2010-01-26 23:42 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/hotspot/rev/2b8bce60ef94
dynopt, trustfinal: update to match JDK7 pushes
! dynopt-6912064.patch
! trustfinal-6912065.patch
___
ml
Changeset: 93701359885e
Author:jrose
Date: 2010-01-26 23:16 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/hotspot/rev/93701359885e
osxpaths: fix linker misconfiguration after 6367077
+ osxpaths.patch
! series
___
mlvm-dev mailing list
Changeset: 613899af65a3
Author:jrose
Date: 2010-01-26 23:15 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/jdk/rev/613899af65a3
osxpaths: fix linker misconfiguration after 6367077
+ osxpaths.patch
! series
___
mlvm-dev mailing list
mlvm
On Jan 26, 2010, at 4:52 PM, Mark Mahieu wrote:
> On 26 Jan 2010, at 22:01, John Rose wrote:
>> Shall we do some more? (Just wondering about it today. No special
>> reason... :-)
>
> Well, perhaps I should poke my head up and suggest that this project, and
> your own writings on the subject
On 26 Jan 2010, at 22:01, John Rose wrote:
> Shall we do some more? (Just wondering about it today. No special
> reason... :-)
Well, perhaps I should poke my head up and suggest that this project, and your
own writings on the subject in particular, may have turned more heads than you
yet k
On Jan 26, 2010, at 2:12 PM, Mohamed Bana wrote:
> Perhaps Sun
Well, it's probably "perhaps Oracle" any time now; we'll see how things shake
out.
In any case, "Sun" doesn't do such side-projects, so much as they are created
by individual overworked but entrepreneurial engineers and engineering
Perhaps Sun should target more universities in addition to Johannes Kepler
University Linz (JKU). Perhaps more prototypes will arrive that way.
I've asked around and people have said that a google summer of code project
for enhancing the JVM was previously rejected. Has anyone tried to file one
On Jan 26, 2010, at 5:02 AM, Raffaello Giulietti wrote:
Good questions; thanks Raffaello.
> What is the current status of "tailcalls meet invokedynamic"? I mean,
> not the interesting entry in John's blog but the status in the
> implementation?
It's not yet started. It requires some pretty inte
Le 26/01/2010 14:02, Raffaello Giulietti a écrit :
> What is the current status of "tailcalls meet invokedynamic"? I mean,
> not the interesting entry in John's blog but the status in the
> implementation?
>
NYI (Not Yet Implemented).
> And what about
> * AnonymousClasses
>
Jdk7 contains
Changeset: d6dbb6e6c4b2
Author:twisti
Date: 2010-01-26 14:41 +0100
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/hotspot/rev/d6dbb6e6c4b2
indy-c1-x86: New patch.
+ indy-c1-x86.patch
! series
___
mlvm-dev mailing list
mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.ne
What is the current status of "tailcalls meet invokedynamic"? I mean,
not the interesting entry in John's blog but the status in the
implementation?
And what about
* AnonymousClasses
* ImmediateWrappers
* TupleSignatures
___
mlvm-dev mailing list
mlvm-d
>> When trying MLVM, I have make the following test as in attachment
>> "Test.java".
>>
>> I have compiled and runned it three times (cf. "cmd.log") with bad
>> expected behaviour (only partial loop, not running up to 10), and
>> one time with a crash (cf. "hs_err_pid1008.log").
>>
>> Are thes
> I took me some time to see the actual problem: there's no JSR 292
> support for the client compiler yet. I'm currently working on that and
> it's almost finished.
>
> To successfully run your test use the server compiler:
>
> java.exe -server -XX:+UnlockExperimentalVMOptions -XX:+EnableMethodH
Le 26/01/2010 09:46, Daniel Latrémolière a écrit :
> When trying MLVM, I have make the following test as in attachment
> "Test.java".
>
> I have compiled and runned it three times (cf. "cmd.log") with bad
> expected behaviour (only partial loop, not running up to 10), and
> one time with a c
On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 10:45 +0100, Rémi Forax wrote:
> Christian and John,
> I've also noticed that the code written should not compile,
> invoking a method handle with invoke() can throw any throwable
> and it seems that javac patch to require to catch/throws Throwable
> was not pushed to jdk7 mai
Le 26/01/2010 09:46, Daniel Latrémolière a écrit :
When trying MLVM, I have make the following test as in attachment
"Test.java".
I have compiled and runned it three times (cf. "cmd.log") with bad
expected behaviour (only partial loop, not running up to 10), and
one time with a crash (cf.
On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 09:46 +0100, Daniel Latrémolière wrote:
> C:\Users\daniel\Documents\NetBeansProjects\Test\src>"C:\Program
> Files\Java\jdk1.7.0\bin\java.exe" -XX:+UnlockExperimentalVMOptions
> -XX:+EnableMethodHandles -XX:+EnableInvokeDynamic Test
> Direct (10): 313
> Handle (25740): 13
When trying MLVM, I have make the following test as in attachment
"Test.java".
I have compiled and runned it three times (cf. "cmd.log") with bad
expected behaviour (only partial loop, not running up to 10), and
one time with a crash (cf. "hs_err_pid1008.log").
Are these problems already
18 matches
Mail list logo
