On Apr 12, 2011, at 2:56 PM, Ola Bini wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>> Since there are not many projects out there that already use JSR 292
>> (JRuby and phpreboot are the only real users that I know of, but maybe I
>> missed something), the code path coverage is low a
Ok, I'll pull together a self contained app to try
mark
From:
Christian Thalinger
To:
Da Vinci Machine Project
Date:
04/12/2011 12:54 AM
Subject:
Re: 292 Rocks, Core Smalltalk running thanks to all
Sent by:
mlvm-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net
On Apr 11, 2011, at 8:01 PM, Mark Roos
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Since there are not many projects out there that already use JSR 292
> (JRuby and phpreboot are the only real users that I know of, but maybe I
> missed something), the code path coverage is low and almost every new
> project finds a bug (or more).
C
On Apr 11, 2011, at 8:01 PM, Mark Roos wrote:
> Hi Christian,
> I've always liked your enthusiasm
>
> So far we are running on OSX and the latest win7 build. both work fine.
>
> Now that we have the core running we need to move to java.lang.invoke ( which
> should be trivial).
>
> What is
Hi Christian,
I've always liked your enthusiasm
So far we are running on OSX and the latest win7 build. both work fine.
Now that we have the core running we need to move to java.lang.invoke (
which should be trivial).
What is it you like to look at? Once we make the move I could package up
On Apr 11, 2011, at 3:00 PM, Mark Roos wrote:
> I know you are all working hard to bring 292 to a release so I thought I
> would take a moment
> to thank you all for your work and to tell you how much that work helped with
> our Smalltalk
> porting.
>
> We have about 500K lines of Smalltalk c
I know you are all working hard to bring 292 to a release so I thought I
would take a moment
to thank you all for your work and to tell you how much that work helped
with our Smalltalk
porting.
We have about 500K lines of Smalltalk code which we want to run on the
JVM. The approach we
picked w
