Le 08/04/2010 09:49, Christian Thalinger a écrit :
> On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 19:20 +0200, Lukas Stadler wrote:
>
>> I'm currently writing a paper about the coroutine implementation for
>> this year's PPPJ conference. That'll take up most of my time for the
>> next two weeks.
>>
> Hmpf. Tha
On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 19:20 +0200, Lukas Stadler wrote:
> I'm currently writing a paper about the coroutine implementation for
> this year's PPPJ conference. That'll take up most of my time for the
> next two weeks.
Hmpf. That reminds me that I promised to write one too about the JSR
292 implem
On Apr 7, 2010, at 10:55 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
>> what I'd like to say is "if you want to apply coro.patch then
>> you need to exclude all other patches".
>> I suppose there's a simpler way to do that?
If you use only the single guard +coro you should get that effect.
Drop the other "
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Lukas Stadler wrote:
> Wow, I didn't expect to instantly get that much feedback!
>
> I'm sorry, I should have updated the code examples to reflect the API
> changes I did last week.
>
> I'm currently writing a paper about the coroutine implementation for
> this yea
Wow, I didn't expect to instantly get that much feedback!
I'm sorry, I should have updated the code examples to reflect the API
changes I did last week.
I'm currently writing a paper about the coroutine implementation for
this year's PPPJ conference. That'll take up most of my time for the
nex
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Lukas Stadler wrote:
> Today I toyed around a little bit with JRuby and coroutines.
>
> I modified JRuby to use my coroutine implementation and ran some
> fiber-microbenchmarks. The results are pretty good:
> http://classparser.blogspot.com/2010/04/jruby-coroutines
On Apr 6, 2010, at 8:07 PM, Stephen Bannasch wrote:
> I'm confused about how to interpret these two guards for coro.patch: '+coro'
> and '-/coro'
>
> What does the prefix '-/' signify?
/foo by local convention means "not foo". Therefore, -/foo is a double
negative. It may be needed (besides
If I set guards="buildable coro" I get patches that don't apply cleanly.
When I run: hg qguard -l in sources/hotspot
I see this for coro.patch:
coro.patch: +coro -/coro +/meth +/indy +/callcc +/inti +/dynopt +1e976d3fd820
-testable
I'm confused about how to interpret these two guards for coro.
At 6:16 PM +0200 4/6/10, Lukas Stadler wrote:
>Today I toyed around a little bit with JRuby and coroutines.
Kukas, that's exciting!
Building today with guards="buildable testable" seems to include the coro.patch
http://gist.github.com/358261
But I'm not able to successfully run CoroutineTest1.
Ok, I've had a chance to look your post over. Really awesome work!
I've had it on my to-do list for weeks to get your stuff wired in, but
never got around to it.
So yeah, this is great and I'm ready to merge in changes *right now*
:) Obviously you had to change things in JRuby, so we'd probably wa
Fabulous stuff. I should mention that our Ruby 1.9 mode still is in
pure-interpreted mode so once we get our JIT hooked up these numbers
should look even nicer!
-Tom
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Lukas Stadler wrote:
> Today I toyed around a little bit with JRuby and coroutines.
>
> I modifi
Oh my god, this is awesome. I'll respond with more later.
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Lukas Stadler wrote:
> Today I toyed around a little bit with JRuby and coroutines.
>
> I modified JRuby to use my coroutine implementation and ran some
> fiber-microbenchmarks. The results are pretty good:
12 matches
Mail list logo
