Hi all,
I just grabbed the latest version of the OpenJDK 8 build from
http://openjdk-osx-build.googlecode.com/files/OpenJDK-1.8-x86_64-b11-2012-release.dmg
but it doesn't seem to contain the recent drop of lambdas, as I was
unable to compile this simple Java class:
public class Main {
Hi,
My understanding is that lambdas are currently a separate hg forest
(to allow the lambdas team to go faster), and that the team will be
bringing code across from lambdas into jdk8 mainline, and then
rebaselining.
So it may not be possible to build a combined jdk8 + lambdas at the
moment. (Bri
Hi Behrang,
the lambda workspace is not yet included in the master workspace of
openjdk 8
because a lot of APIs/implementations are too young/too experimental.
Rémi
On 11/17/2011 01:31 PM, Behrang Saeedzadeh wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just grabbed the latest version of the OpenJDK 8 build from
> htt
On 11/17/11 2:02 PM, Ben Evans wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My understanding is that lambdas are currently a separate hg forest
> (to allow the lambdas team to go faster), and that the team will be
> bringing code across from lambdas into jdk8 mainline, and then
> rebaselining.
Yeah, in general in OpenJDK we
> So Lambda (& Jigsaw) are in their own Projects with their own
> hg forests. Note that Mike & Maurizio synced up the lambda forest
> with JDK 8 recently:
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/lambda-dev/2011-November/004128.html
> so creating such builds should be easier then before, but given
On 11/17/2011 02:50 PM, Henri Gomez wrote:
>> So Lambda (& Jigsaw) are in their own Projects with their own
>> hg forests. Note that Mike& Maurizio synced up the lambda forest
>> with JDK 8 recently:
>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/lambda-dev/2011-November/004128.html
>> so creating suc
Sounds like a great idea. Go for it, provided you have time / cycles.
On Nov 17, 2011 2:50 PM, "Henri Gomez" wrote:
> > So Lambda (& Jigsaw) are in their own Projects with their own
> > hg forests. Note that Mike & Maurizio synced up the lambda forest
> > with JDK 8 recently:
> >
> http://mail.op
> Sounds like a great idea. Go for it, provided you have time / cycles.
I saw many patches for OS/X MLVM.
What about patches for http://jdk8.java.net/lambda/ ?
___
mlvm-dev mailing list
mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/lis
> Yeah, in general in OpenJDK we tend to create new Projects for new
> major features (like a mac port, or this one ... ;)- that allows
> the team of people working on a feature to work in splendid isolation
> until the feature is ready to get merged into a mainline release.
>
> So Lambda (& Jigsaw
Part of the challenge will be that 8 is a quickly moving target,
lambda is synced with 8 sporadically, and mac port is based on 7,
(and in the future 7u) which is a quickly moving target, diverging
from 8, obviously.
My suggestion would be to start by looking at the diff between 7 and
mac port, a
> My understanding is that lambdas are currently a separate hg forest
> (to allow the lambdas team to go faster), and that the team will be
> bringing code across from lambdas into jdk8 mainline, and then
> rebaselining.
>
> So it may not be possible to build a combined jdk8 + lambdas at the
> mom
2011/11/17 Brian Goetz :
>> My understanding is that lambdas are currently a separate hg forest
>> (to allow the lambdas team to go faster), and that the team will be
>> bringing code across from lambdas into jdk8 mainline, and then
>> rebaselining.
>>
>> So it may not be possible to build a combin
12 matches
Mail list logo
