On Apr 23, 2012, at 4:29 PM, Rémi Forax wrote:
> On 04/24/2012 12:57 AM, Kohsuke Kawaguchi wrote:
>> On 04/23/2012 11:18 AM, Rémi Forax wrote:
So again, I don't see how shifting from method handle tree to byte
code generation would somehow make this non-issue.
>>>
>>> In fact, it's eas
On 04/25/2012 06:38 PM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
> On Apr 23, 2012, at 4:29 PM, Rémi Forax wrote:
>
>> On 04/24/2012 12:57 AM, Kohsuke Kawaguchi wrote:
>>> On 04/23/2012 11:18 AM, Rémi Forax wrote:
> So again, I don't see how shifting from method handle tree to byte
> code generation woul
>> That's a lot of optimization that I otherwise wouldn't have to do, if
>> only boxed types and constant propagation worked well, but yeah, I see
>> how it can work now.
Clearly the C1/C2 compiler needs to be improved. In the meantime
you have to work around their limitations.
> BTW, I've patche
On 04/25/2012 10:23 AM, Fredrik Öhrström wrote:
>>> That's a lot of optimization that I otherwise wouldn't have to do, if
>>> only boxed types and constant propagation worked well, but yeah, I see
>>> how it can work now.
>
> Clearly the C1/C2 compiler needs to be improved. In the meantime
> you
On 04/25/2012 07:23 PM, Fredrik Öhrström wrote:
>>> That's a lot of optimization that I otherwise wouldn't have to do, if
>>> only boxed types and constant propagation worked well, but yeah, I see
>>> how it can work now.
> Clearly the C1/C2 compiler needs to be improved. In the meantime
> you have
>From Christian
Although something that John and I talked about yesterday could help here:
immutable (or stable) arrays. We might add some optimization for this
soon since we'd need it for bound arguments in our new JSR 292
implementation.
I also have a somewhat large ( 5K) cache of my boxe
On Apr 25, 2012, at 11:03 AM, Mark Roos wrote:
> From Christian
>
> Although something that John and I talked about yesterday could help here:
> immutable (or stable) arrays. We might add some optimization for this soon
> since we'd need it for bound arguments in our new JSR 292 implementat
Hi Christian
you mention
the only way I can think of to make this available to users is an
annotation.
Since I am writing my own bytecodes/classes I am not limited to how the
java language might do this.
If there is a way for me to tweak the class file to pass the request to
hotspot th
