"Frozen" would be great I think, and it will definitely please the Rubyists
:-)
- Julien
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 2:12 AM, Remi Forax wrote:
> On 11/07/2012 10:35 PM, John Rose wrote:
> > Thanks! This will move the conversation forward.
> >
> > -- John (on my iPhone)
>
> John, Mark,
> please t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 08.11.2012 02:29, schrieb Jim Laskey:
> +1
I think frozen is very descriptive.
+1
>
> On 2012-11-07, at 9:16 PM, Vitaly Davidovich
> mailto:vita...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>> How about frozen?
>>
>> Sent from my phone
>>
>> On Nov 7, 2012 8:15 P
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 08.11.2012 03:36, schrieb BGB:
> On 11/7/2012 7:02 PM, Remi Forax wrote:
>> On 11/07/2012 11:30 PM, BGB wrote:
>>> On 11/7/2012 4:15 PM, Vitaly Davidovich wrote:
Hi John,
Nice to see this effort moving forward. While reading
th
On 11/08/2012 05:47 AM, John Rose wrote:
> On Nov 7, 2012, at 5:12 PM, Remi Forax wrote:
>
>> please the name 'locked object' should be changed,
>> first because the fact that the value object uses bits also used to bias
>> a lock
>> is just an implementation detail and the name is too close to
>>
