Hi Rémi,
thanks for your reply - note that my patch is merely the result of an effort to
meet the requirement of making the single-value storage suggested in the
discussion on https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8031043 fast. This
appears to be difficult. I agree that the performance isn't
Hi Jochen,
thanks for clarifying. I've added results from running the benchmarks on an the
unpatched JDK 9 base (see the CR link). The twisti and plevart patches perform
better for large numbers of classes and class values; the mhaupt patch is
weaker than the baseline in those settings.
As poi
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 6:36 PM, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
> Charlie, did you ever get to writing some benchmarks?
>
Unfortunately not but we are getting into a performance phase over the next
couple months. I'll see what I can come up with.
- Charlie
__
