Out of curiousity...How tough is it to get new optimizations into
u{1-n} releases? I know new ones go in all the time, I am just
wondering how onerous the process is for approving stuff like that.
-Tom
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 11:27 AM, John Rose wrote:
> On Jun 2, 2011, at 9:01 AM, Charles Olive
Thomas,
I am very excited about RubyTruffle and Truffle/Graal in general but to
date I have never seen any numbers based on startup time? From what I have
gleamed startup time is not a fundamental design goal currently. I have
heard that some of these great numbers take many minutes to warm up
I think I said two things at the same time and I apologize. I am
interested in startup time and also warmup time. Eventual performance
looks great on Chris's blogs...
-Tom
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Thomas E Enebo wrote:
> Thomas,
>
> I am very excited about RubyTruff
Benoit,
Always a pleasure working with you :) If you have any questions or need
assistance you can IM me or talk on #jruby on irc. Concurrency in
Ruby+Truffle is a pretty big missing item; so it will be great to see this
implemented.
-Tom
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 7:26 AM, Benoit Daloze wrote:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 3:42 AM, Y. Srinivas Ramakrishna
wrote:
> Patrick Wright wrote:
> ...
>>
>> Glad to hear that perm gen will eventually go away.
>
> Could you elaborate a little on why it would be nice if the
> perm gen went away? Where would you like its current contents
> (which ones, if
Fabulous stuff. I should mention that our Ruby 1.9 mode still is in
pure-interpreted mode so once we get our JIT hooked up these numbers
should look even nicer!
-Tom
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Lukas Stadler wrote:
> Today I toyed around a little bit with JRuby and coroutines.
>
> I modifi
