+1
Stockholm's nice. Or there's always London...
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 6:36 AM, Marcus Lagergren
marcus.lagerg...@oracle.com wrote:
+1 to that. We could probably host something in Stockholm too, if there
is interest. (We are the third largest Oracle JVM engineering site in the
world
I think we can safely say there's a lot of interest in a European
JVMLS-like event. I'll make every effort to be there if one is
hosted...but I'll leave it up to you European folks to figure out
where and when :-)
Just give me plenty of advance notice ;-)
- Charlie
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 5:28
On 08/04/2013 23:01, Remi Forax fo...@univ-mlv.fr wrote:
yes,
I'm in it too,
and we have to discuss about how to improve the startup time too,
the implementation in 8 is so slow to ramp up that for my current project
the implementation of 7 is 30 to 50% faster (the whole script run less
than 10s).
I would certainly be interested, though travel budgets do seem to be tight
this year.
We could probably host it here in Cambridge if you guys want to come over
to the UK.
On 09/04/2013 08:19, Julien Ponge julien.po...@gmail.com wrote:
Just an idea: would some of you be interested in having a
+1 :-)
Cheers,
Martijn
On 11 April 2013 21:09, Charles Oliver Nutter head...@headius.com wrote:
I would absolutely love to have a European edition of the JVM Language
Summit. It's not a very complicated event to put together, and it
would give us an opportunity to meet with more language
I would absolutely love to have a European edition of the JVM Language
Summit. It's not a very complicated event to put together, and it
would give us an opportunity to meet with more language folks than can
make it to California for JVMLS.
You could count on my attendance.
- Charlie
On Thu,
+1 to that. We could probably host something in Stockholm too, if there is
interest. (We are the third largest Oracle JVM engineering site in the world
after Santa Clara and Burlington, MA).
/M
On Apr 11, 2013, at 10:09 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter head...@headius.com wrote:
I would absolutely
Just an idea: would some of you be interested in having a meeting at some point
in Europe?
I (or Rémi) can probably organise something at our Unis.
- Julien
On Apr 9, 2013, at 4:55 AM, Mark Roos mr...@roos.com wrote:
Thanks for the interest.
I added this workshop to my proposal. Inputs
Summit Wrokshop/talk request
John Rose and Christian Thalinger will likely there from the JVM team.
Marcus Lagergren and Attila Szegedi from the Nashorn team are not
confirmed but if available would be good for user experience.
Cheers,
-- Jim
On 2013-04-08, at 5:39 PM, Mark Roos mr
;-)
-Original Message-
From: mlvm-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net [mailto:mlvm-dev-
boun...@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of Jim Laskey
Sent: Monday, April 8, 2013 23:02
To: Da Vinci Machine Project
Subject: Re: JVM Summit Wrokshop/talk request
John Rose and Christian Thalinger will likely
It seems like quite a bit of work is going on around improving the
performance of invokeDynamic.
It would be interesting ( at least to me ) to have an in depth discussion
of what is being done and
how I should adjust my usage to get the best performance for a dynamic
language.
I'll buy the
Indeed...I think we need to get all us invokedynamicists into the same
room to better understand what's working, what's not, and where to go
from here. Consider me in.
I'm sure it would be accepted, so a proposal would probably be a
formality...but do you want to throw something together, Mark?
From: Charles Oliver Nutter head...@headius.com
To: Da Vinci Machine Project mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net
Date: 04/08/2013 12:26 PM
Subject:Re: JVM Summit Wrokshop/talk request
Sent by:mlvm-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net
Indeed...I think we need to get all us invokedynamicists
can get some volunteers to be the experts I will gladly propose and
mc
a workshop/panel
mark
From:Charles Oliver Nutter head...@headius.com
To:Da Vinci Machine Project mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net
Date:04/08/2013 12:26 PM
Subject:Re: JVM Summit Wrokshop/talk
To:Da Vinci Machine Project mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net
Date:04/08/2013 12:26 PM
Subject:Re: JVM Summit Wrokshop/talk request
Sent by:mlvm-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net
Indeed...I think we need to get all us invokedynamicists
The thought was at the JVM summit in July
mark
From: Julien Ponge julien.po...@gmail.com
To: Da Vinci Machine Project mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net
Date: 04/08/2013 01:23 PM
Subject:Re: JVM Summit Wrokshop/talk request
Sent by:mlvm-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net
Where do
Ok Charles is one expert, how about some folks doing the jvm
implementation?
Any thoughts on who that could be
regards
mark___
mlvm-dev mailing list
mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
John Rose and Christian Thalinger will likely there from the JVM team. Marcus
Lagergren and Attila Szegedi from the Nashorn team are not confirmed but if
available would be good for user experience.
Cheers,
-- Jim
On 2013-04-08, at 5:39 PM, Mark Roos mr...@roos.com wrote:
Ok Charles is
On 04/08/2013 11:01 PM, Jim Laskey wrote:
John Rose and Christian Thalinger will likely there from the JVM team.
Marcus Lagergren and Attila Szegedi from the Nashorn team are not
confirmed but if available would be good for user experience.
Cheers,
-- Jim
yes,
I'm in it too,
and we have
Thanks for the interest.
I added this workshop to my proposal. Inputs are welcome on how to
make it a good workshop.
mark
Improving the performance of InvokeDynamic
Now that we have some experience with InvokeDynamic its time
to discuss strategies and efforts for performance improvement.
We
20 matches
Mail list logo
