Re: [mmh] Accept header lines of exactly 998 characters

I've split the last patch and updated it according to your feedback. Hopefully whitout having lost anything while in transit :) What do you say? From 899eac2cee69e32abe2813735ee7ff0870f5ebd1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Vasilii Kolobkov Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 11:56:11 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/4

Re: [mmh] Accept header lines of exactly 998 characters

[2018-07-19 10:02 +0200] markus schnalke > [2018-07-19 03:24] Philipp Takacs > > [2018-07-18 23:13] Vasilii Kolobkov > > > Yet two of them do fail, but that'd be another patch. The ali tests > > > for the blind lists fail - it's the first time i came to know of >

Re: [mmh] Accept header lines of exactly 998 characters

Thanks for the comments, Philipp! [2018-07-19 03:24 +0200] Philipp Takacs > [2018-07-18 23:13] Vasilii Kolobkov > > +pseq() { > > I'm not sure, if we realy nead this funktion, because it's used on > two places. In the one place it's easy to remove. On the other place > I

Re: [mmh] Accept header lines of exactly 998 characters

as well? Cheers, Vasilii p.s. i prefixed all the portable functions with p* so to not shadown the system ones just in case. ---8<--- From 204ae88524838063493242f012a1b1fe2fcf2d05 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Vasilii Kolobkov Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2018 23:05:09 +0200 Subj

Re: [mmh] Accept header lines of exactly 998 characters

[2018-07-16 21:45 +0200] markus schnalke > [2018-07-16 20:56] Vasilii Kolobkov > > [2018-07-16 12:23 +0200] markus schnalke > > > Although $((...)) ist part of POSIX. I'd like to avoid it, if > > > possible. All uses of $((...)) in our test cases can be easily > &

Re: [mmh] Accept header lines of exactly 998 characters

[2018-07-16 14:17 +0200] Philipp Takacs > [2018-07-16 09:20] Vasilii Kolobkov > > [2018-07-16 03:18 +0200] Philipp Takacs > > > What a strange BSD are you using, maybe OpenBSD ;-)? seq is part of Net, > > > Free and DragonflyBSD. Ok, the awk bug/missing

Re: [mmh] Accept header lines of exactly 998 characters

Good evening folks! [2018-07-16 12:23 +0200] markus schnalke > [2018-07-15 23:29] Vasilii Kolobkov > > 1. Generate sequences vi shell script as BSDs lack seq(1) > > That's unfortunate, as seq(1) is such a great tool. It's not part > of POSIX though. (It originated in Rese

Re: [mmh] Accept header lines of exactly 998 characters

[2018-07-16 03:18 +0200] Philipp Takacs > What a strange BSD are you using, maybe OpenBSD ;-)? seq is part of Net, > Free and DragonflyBSD. Ok, the awk bug/missing feature is also in FreeBSD. There's no hiding from you, Philipp! I thought those issues to be rather common in BSD-land and am

Re: [mmh] Accept header lines of exactly 998 characters

ost of the show(1) tests, and i'll be fixing the rest should you deem it useful. Cheers, Vasilii ---8<--- From a8035ca600799e10b1aab2fd9f1b9fe97e2f9aad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Vasilii Kolobkov Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2018 23:05:09 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Make show/test-longline

Re: [mmh] Accept header lines of exactly 998 characters

Hey Philipp! [2018-07-14 14:16 +0200] Philipp Takacs > I have two follow up patches. The first one fixes crlf handling for > long lines in m_getfld2. The secound fix the simular length checking > bug in sposts. Great, i did notice the LF/CRLF discrepancy too, but was too lazy to fix it :) > By

[mmh] Accept header lines of exactly 998 characters

Holla mmh folks, hope you're doing fine! Lately I've been getting issues with messages containing header lines of 998 characters. This patch fixes it. ---8<--- From ee20b90a40bfa483008fdb7caa7c9e023d519870 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Vasilii Kolobkov Date: Wed, 11

[mmh] archiving encrypted mail

Hello mmh folks! Does anybody here save their outgoing encrypted mail unencrypted? Any ideas on how would be best to handle this? Cheers, Vasilii