Re: [mmh] scan and pick (was: How "modern" are you willing to go?)

Hoi. [2016-09-18 13:21] Philipp Takacs > [2016-09-09 19:45] Philipp Takacs > > It wouldn't be that complicate. We would to replace the > > > > > printf("%s\n", m_name(msgnum)); > > > > with a call to scan() and add the ``-format'' switch. > > >

Re: [mmh] scan and pick (was: How "modern" are you willing to go?)

[2016-12-28 22:03] Philipp Takacs > > part text/plain2140 > [2016-09-20 16:56] Dmitry Bogatov > > Seems, symlink replacement of 'scan' is not part of this patch, isn't it? > > No, I have written this patch to have some code to

Re: [mmh] scan and pick (was: How "modern" are you willing to go?)

[2016-09-20 16:56] Dmitry Bogatov > Seems, symlink replacement of 'scan' is not part of this patch, isn't it? No, I have written this patch to have some code to discuss and get a response from markus what he thinks now about merging scan and pick. Thats why I have focused on the

Re: [mmh] scan and pick (was: How "modern" are you willing to go?)

> [2016-09-09 19:45] Philipp Takacs > > It wouldn't be that complicate. We would to replace the > > > > > printf("%s\n", m_name(msgnum)); > > > > with a call to scan() and add the ``-format'' switch. > > > > I have implemented this to have a code example we can discouse >

Re: [mmh] scan and pick (was: How "modern" are you willing to go?)

[2016-09-09 19:45] Philipp Takacs > It wouldn't be that complicate. We would to replace the > > > printf("%s\n", m_name(msgnum)); > > with a call to scan() and add the ``-format'' switch. > > In other words pick supports only the format '=%(msg)' at > the moment. If we