As another note... I hadn't really thought about it this way before-
and I don't know if these were your thoughts at all- but I can see how
someone could view giving a score of 4 on a scale from 0-5 as meaning
80% mastered or something, instead of being learned at the
completely optimal rate. So
:) Just as a word of advice from someone who's been using it for not
much longer than you have been...
Unless you think a certain Q/A pair is extremely easy, you ought to
avoid giving it a 5. For example, out of my 2500+ cards, only a
small percentage have been given that score-- things like
Patrick, Peter,
thanks for your quick replies - I know, there's no help for being
blocked from here, but the manual is a great start (and I'l continue
looking through the tips)... I'll see if they have what I need and if
not, will be back with questions. Thanks again!
On Monday 22 December 2008 00:30:40 Oisín Mac Fhearaí wrote:
2008/12/21 Bill Price (formerly Notyourbroom) notyourbr...@gmail.com:
I'm not sure if it's a likely source of confusion. In the docs I think
it's described appropriately, linking it with how optimally scheduled
it was as you have
