[mochikit] Re: Activity

2007-10-09 Thread scipio
> > Desparately short sighted: if you leave a web site > > untouched for a year, most people will assume its > > dead and move on. In discussions about JS client > > frameworks I've already seen several comments suggesting > > that MK development is dead. > > > How hard can it be to tag the repo

[mochikit] Re: Activity

2007-10-08 Thread Kevin Kaiser
Wouldn't the solution just be to update mochikit.com to indicate that the project is stable, maintained silently in the background and isn't seeking to do active, steady releases due to already fulfilling its original function? A lot of software projects end up growing out of control after too ma

[mochikit] Re: Activity

2007-10-06 Thread Arnar Birgisson
On 10/3/07, scipio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How hard can it be to tag the repository and > update a couple lines of text on a web page? Do you need any specific functionality that isn't in place in MochiKit? At least for me, MK is doing what I need it to do, and as long as there are bugfixes

[mochikit] Re: Activity

2007-10-05 Thread Bob Ippolito
On 10/3/07, scipio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Aug 18, 11:59 am, Beau Hartshorne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 18-Aug-07, at 8:44 AM, Lee Connell wrote: > > > > > Mochikit hasn't seen any activity in the revision history at least > > > since 06, is mochikit fading? > > > > We're pret

[mochikit] Re: Activity

2007-10-05 Thread scipio
On Aug 18, 11:59 am, Beau Hartshorne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 18-Aug-07, at 8:44 AM, Lee Connell wrote: > > > Mochikit hasn't seen any activity in the revision history at least > > since 06, is mochikit fading? > > We're pretty busy with our own projects, and haven't had much time to > ta

[mochikit] Re: Activity

2007-09-26 Thread tjs
On Aug 19, 1:59 am, Beau Hartshorne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 18-Aug-07, at 8:44 AM, Lee Connell wrote: > > > Mochikit hasn't seen any activity in the revision history at least > > since 06, is mochikit fading? > > We're pretty busy with our own projects, and haven't had much time to > tag

[mochikit] Re: Activity

2007-08-18 Thread Beau Hartshorne
On 18-Aug-07, at 8:44 AM, Lee Connell wrote: > Mochikit hasn't seen any activity in the revision history at least > since 06, is mochikit fading? We're pretty busy with our own projects, and haven't had much time to tag a release. /trunk is very stable, and is updated with features and bugfi