On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 09:29:43 +0800 (CST), "潘庆峰"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> Hi,
>I am not sure it's a good ideaanyone else has comment on it?
The big issue is that Apache flags the server as suexecEnabled even if
the
suexec capability is not turned on. It merely detects the existence
Gunnar Thielebein wrote:
Hi all,
i did get trac running with fcgid on apache in gentoo without thread and
mpm_prefork which works but was pretty slow on an pIII. same was with
mod_pyton. So I tested with compiling apache with mpm_worker and get
this message when trying fcgid again (mod_pyth
Hi,
I am not sure it's a good ideaanyone else has comment on it?
Thanks
在2007-12-12，"Erik Wasser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 写道：
Hello list,
I've made a patch for this old posting[1].
My problem was that I need to use 'mod_fcgid' but without the suexec
stuff. My apache is already runni
Hi,
I think it's nothing to do with mod_fcgid, mod_fcgid will fork a process
manager while apache is start,
and all sub processes(your python programs) will be forked by this process
manager.
So, it's no difference from mpm_worker and mpm_prefork in your case
Thanks
在2007-12-12，"Gu
Hi all,
i did get trac running with fcgid on apache in gentoo without thread and
mpm_prefork which works but was pretty slow on an pIII. same was with
mod_pyton. So I tested with compiling apache with mpm_worker and get
this message when trying fcgid again (mod_python works here too but also
slow)
Hello list,
I've made a patch for this old posting[1].
My problem was that I need to use 'mod_fcgid' but without the suexec
stuff. My apache is already running as non-root and I need a little
speedup of my script based CMS (I'm using catalyst).
So I've added the flag 'Disable_suexec_check'. So
