Actually the AT+CNMI? query response of 0,0,0,0,0 means the new SMS messages
should be
stored in the SIM, but the indications of their reception will not be issued.
I would
imagine the AT+CMGL command would list the messages if it is sent over the
secondary
channel (assuming the primary is cur
Hi David,
I'm glad that it is working for you without the FCC Auth command! However
I am not able to replicate this behavior. I suppose it is possible that
you have some update that I do not, but it is also possible that the
firmware is slightly different for some reason. I'm not an expert!
Wh
Am Mittwoch, 19. August 2015, 12:52:49 schrieb Dan Williams:
> Hi,
>
> I had at least one report of a HiSense device that had successful
> AT^NDISSTATQRY reply but DHCP didn't work. There's been discussion on
> this in the past [1] with no real conclusion that I can see, but maybe
> ^DHCP works h
On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 17:03 +0200, Aleksander Morgado wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Highland, Glenn
> wrote:
> >
> > Aleksander suggested that I propose the change below to the mailing list.
> >
> > Essentially we're encountering a problem with SMS notifications not being
> > received
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Highland, Glenn wrote:
>
> Aleksander suggested that I propose the change below to the mailing list.
>
> Essentially we're encountering a problem with SMS notifications not being
> received
> by the application from ModemManager v1.4.6 (and v1.4.10 for that matter)
All,
Aleksander suggested that I propose the change below to the mailing list.
Essentially we're encountering a problem with SMS notifications not being
received
by the application from ModemManager v1.4.6 (and v1.4.10 for that matter).
This
is using a Telit HE910-D that has two USB endpoint
nope, it didn't help
Am 31.08.2015 um 20:22 schrieb João M. S. Silva:
On 08/26/2015 05:51 PM, Harald Jung wrote:
I've built a version with ModemManager started seperatly from
NetworkManager.
I can check it tommorow with a notebook, which has this problem.
Did it work?
_
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 5:53 PM, Aleksander Morgado wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 6:41 PM, Raul Suarez Moreno
> wrote:
> > Aleksander, you mean using the "--with-newest-qmi-commands" configure is
> not
> > advisable?? In fact, I built using that configuration just because it was
> > used in the