Hello,
Having an odd issue where ModemManager has trouble reading SIM PIN status from
Sierra MC7750 (Verizon US, LTE+CDMA, QMI interface) modules after a modem reset.
At first system boot, MM has no issue detecting the modem and activating a
connection. These are in mobile devices, so it's
Hi Reinhard,
On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 10:27:41PM +0200, Reinhard Speyerer wrote:
> for IPType IPv4v6 the IPType returned may be IPv4 or IPv6 instead of IPv4v6
> in the case where PDP context activation is accepted by the network but it
> returns a SM Cause 2 IE like this:
> ...
Yes, thank you. I
On Sun, Oct 07, 2018 at 08:27:58PM +0200, Andreas Fett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Oct 06, 2018 at 02:49:32PM +0200, Aleksander Morgado wrote:
> > > I could be mis-remembering, but I don't think this was intentional and
> > > if MBIM says IPv6 isn't available, then MM shouldn't say it's available
>
Aleksander Morgado writes:
> Hey!
>
>> > Devices like the AC313U require explicit context monitoring with !SCACT?.
>> > Otherwise, we may end up with the modem reported as connected in MM, with
>> > IP settings in the network interface and all, but without a real connection
>> > inside the
>> BUT, why is it that the modem cannot be supported by the Cinterion
>> plugin? Which are the commands that are different? Can the Cinterion
>> plugin not be updated to support this new model as well?
>>
> Then AT command such as "AT^SQPORT?" is not supported by "Cinterion Gemalto
> ELS61". And
Hi,
matthew stanger 於 2018年10月9日 週二 上午2:48寫道:
> Hi Ken,
>
> Given the datasheet Dan linked it seems like that modem family does
> support the 'SWWAN' connection interface type. Given that I'd expect basic
> connection attempts to work. Can you enable MM debugging and post the logs
> of a
Hi,
Aleksander Morgado 於 2018年10月9日 週二 上午12:16寫道:
> Hey,
>
> > I'm now working on a modem "Cinterion Gemalto ELS61". And I tried to use
> it with ModemManager.
> > ModemManager suggests the "Cinterion" plugin. But somehow, the AT
> command set and some response message format of "Cinterion
Hey!
> > Devices like the AC313U require explicit context monitoring with !SCACT?.
> > Otherwise, we may end up with the modem reported as connected in MM, with
> > IP settings in the network interface and all, but without a real connection
> > inside the modem.
>
> Really? I must admit that
Aleksander Morgado writes:
> Devices like the AC313U require explicit context monitoring with !SCACT?.
> Otherwise, we may end up with the modem reported as connected in MM, with
> IP settings in the network interface and all, but without a real connection
> inside the modem.
Really? I must
Hey,
Devices like the AC313U require explicit context monitoring with !SCACT?.
Otherwise, we may end up with the modem reported as connected in MM, with
IP settings in the network interface and all, but without a real connection
inside the modem.
This MR implements the support for this periodic
10 matches
Mail list logo