Florian Effenberger wrote (08-04-11 10:47)
Hi,
sophie wrote on 2011-04-08 09.07:
My opinion is that we are moderating subscriptions/spam, not real
content, so I'll let it through
I think so, too. We should only reject a message when:
1. It is insulting, criminal or by any other way really no
Hi Christoph,
On 08/04/2011 11:09, Christoph Noack wrote:
Hi all!
Am Freitag, den 08.04.2011, 10:07 +0300 schrieb sophie:
Hi Cor,
On 08/04/2011 08:21, Cor Nouws wrote:
Hi,
The message below has been moderated. IMO it does not add so much to
the discussion. So I'dd rather rejected it.
What do
Hi all!
Am Freitag, den 08.04.2011, 10:07 +0300 schrieb sophie:
> Hi Cor,
> On 08/04/2011 08:21, Cor Nouws wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The message below has been moderated. IMO it does not add so much to
> > the discussion. So I'dd rather rejected it.
> > What do others think?
> My opinion is that we
Hi,
sophie wrote on 2011-04-08 09.07:
My opinion is that we are moderating subscriptions/spam, not real
content, so I'll let it through
I think so, too. We should only reject a message when:
1. It is insulting, criminal or by any other way really not for the lists
2. Someone posts without kno
Hi Cor,
On 08/04/2011 08:21, Cor Nouws wrote:
Hi,
The message below has been moderated. IMO it does not add so much to
the discussion. So I'dd rather rejected it.
What do others think?
My opinion is that we are moderating subscriptions/spam, not real
content, so I'll let it through
Kind reg
On Apr 8, 2011, at 07:21 , Cor Nouws wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The message below has been moderated. IMO it does not add so much to the
> discussion. So I'dd rather rejected it.
> What do others think?
>
> Thanks,
> Cor
I also thought it was not worth forwarding and erased it.
But not without some th
Hi,
The message below has been moderated. IMO it does not add so much to the
discussion. So I'dd rather rejected it.
What do others think?
Thanks,
Cor
Original Message
Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: I am downloading LibreOffice to try it out.
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 15:10:2
