Re: Source Code Shows Up in IE But Not Netscape

2000-05-11 Thread w trillich
> Bri Carey wrote: > > > > > When I display an .iphtml page in Netscape, everything seems to be fine. > > > > > > > > When I display it in IE (4.72), I get a plain text output of the source > > > > code, including html tags. > > > > > > > > Why this discrepancy? > > > > I've tried setting the def

Re: Apache::AutoIndex patch

2000-05-11 Thread w trillich
"Alexei V. Barantsev" wrote: > > w trillich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > speaking of autoindex issues-- i can't get apache to > > display the HEADER or README files (above and > > below the tabular file listing), and when i posted > > my most recent question, someone else piped up and > > s

Re: talking about cookies (was: session something...)

2000-05-11 Thread Jeffrey W. Baker
On Thu, 11 May 2000, Marc Slemko wrote: > In reality, IE's recently publicized hole (which I reported to them, in a > slightly modified form, months ago but they didn't see fit to release a > patch...) doesn't change much. > > Hotmail? Yahoo mail? amazon.com? etc. Your cookies for all those

Re: talking about cookies (was: session something...)

2000-05-11 Thread Marc Slemko
On Fri, 12 May 2000, Stas Bekman wrote: > > For all those who favor chocolate cookies (mostly related to the latest > discussion about the sessions): > > IE hole exposes Web surfers' private data: Microsoft is working on a > patch that will prevent its Internet Explorer browser from inadverten

talking about cookies (was: session something...)

2000-05-11 Thread Stas Bekman
For all those who favor chocolate cookies (mostly related to the latest discussion about the sessions): IE hole exposes Web surfers' private data: Microsoft is working on a patch that will prevent its Internet Explorer browser from inadvertently letting Web sites peer into any visitor's cookie

[OT] Re: Best approach for loading several modules

2000-05-11 Thread Stas Bekman
On Thu, 11 May 2000, Martin Wood wrote: > >Please read the sections posted by Geoff and others. The *already* posted > >link: > >http://perl.apache.org/guide/config.html#The_Confusion_with_use_at_the_ > >answers your question. > > Damn mod_perl guide, much too comprehensive for its own good! :)

Re: Best approach for loading several modules

2000-05-11 Thread Martin Wood
>Please read the sections posted by Geoff and others. The *already* posted >link: >http://perl.apache.org/guide/config.html#The_Confusion_with_use_at_the_ >answers your question. Damn mod_perl guide, much too comprehensive for its own good! :) > Please invest some time into reading before crying

RE: Virtual servers mixing up "require"d scripts

2000-05-11 Thread Stas Bekman
On Thu, 11 May 2000, Geoffrey Young wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Ged Haywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2000 12:26 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Virtual servers mixing up "require"d scripts > > > > > > Hi there, > > > > On Th

Re: Best approach for loading several modules

2000-05-11 Thread Stas Bekman
On Thu, 11 May 2000, Martin Wood wrote: > > but code isn't duplicated if you pre-load your modules: > > > http://perl.apache.org/guide/performance.html#Preload_Perl_Modules_at_Server > > _S > > I realise the actual code isn't duplicated - but the script itself still > needs the list of "use" d

[OT] Re: speed up/load balancing of session-based sites

2000-05-11 Thread Stas Bekman
On Thu, 11 May 2000, Leslie Mikesell wrote: > According to Mark Imbriaco: > > > > "Perrin" == Perrin Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Perrin> I think every RDBMS I've seen, includig MySQL, guarantees > > > Perrin> atomicity at this level. > > > > > > Look, Mummy, the funny m

Re: Best approach for loading several modules

2000-05-11 Thread Joshua Chamas
Martin Wood wrote: > > Thanks for the replies so far all - things are already becoming clearer. > > > If you add a "standard" module to your set, how will it affect > > existing apps if they don't directly need it or call it? Why have the > > "use" statement at all if that particular module is

AxKit update

2000-05-11 Thread Matt Sergeant
For those not on the axkit mailing list, I thought you might like a quickie AxKit update: First an introduction: AxKit is a standards based XML templating system, and much more. Ultimately it's an application server, but there's more work to do to reach that level, IMHO. Right now it can deliver

Re: Best approach for loading several modules

2000-05-11 Thread Perrin Harkins
On Thu, 11 May 2000, Martin Wood wrote: > Our Apache::Registry CGIs need access to a dozen or so core modules - is > there an elegant solution to loading these without seeing a dozen or so use > statements at the head of the script? Yes. As Vivek pointed out, you can move them all into a startup

RE: Virtual servers mixing up "require"d scripts

2000-05-11 Thread Geoffrey Young
> -Original Message- > From: Ged Haywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2000 12:26 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Virtual servers mixing up "require"d scripts > > > Hi there, > > On Thu, 11 May 2000, Uri Bernstein wrote: > > > Hi, > > In order to prov

Re: Virtual servers mixing up "require"d scripts

2000-05-11 Thread Ged Haywood
Hi there, On Thu, 11 May 2000, Uri Bernstein wrote: > Hi, > In order to provide a "private" development environment to each of > our developers, we defined a virtual server per developer. Each virtual > server has its root aliased to a different directory > [snip] > This seems to work fine most

where to get socks library??

2000-05-11 Thread Steven Bauer
I am trying to build apache 1.3.12 with mod_perl 1.23, and perl 5.6 on solaris 2.7   everytime I run the modperl build it changes my apache config to require socks. I have been disabling it. but it is getting to be a PITA.  Where can I get a socks library for solaris???     Steve Bauer CyberD

Re: speed up/load balancing of session-based sites

2000-05-11 Thread Leslie Mikesell
According to Mark Imbriaco: > > > "Perrin" == Perrin Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Perrin> I think every RDBMS I've seen, includig MySQL, guarantees > > Perrin> atomicity at this level. > > > > Look, Mummy, the funny man said MySQL and RDBMS in the same sentence :) > > Plea

Re: Best approach for loading several modules

2000-05-11 Thread Martin Wood
> but code isn't duplicated if you pre-load your modules: > http://perl.apache.org/guide/performance.html#Preload_Perl_Modules_at_Server > _S I realise the actual code isn't duplicated - but the script itself still needs the list of "use" directives regardless of whether you pre-load them and t

Re: Apache::AutoIndex patch

2000-05-11 Thread Alexei V. Barantsev
Ken Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alexei V. Barantsev) wrote: > >Dear modperlers! > > > >I have found that Apache::Autoindex dos not like filenames with > >special characters (like space or ?). Such a name should be > >uri-escaped. See patch below. > > This pa

Re: Running file based sessions via NFS

2000-05-11 Thread Paul Lindner
On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 07:38:14PM -0700, John Armstrong wrote: > Lots of folks are saying the running File based sessions over NFS is > problematic. We are doing it without any noticeable issues so far but > I am _very_ curious as to what we need to watch out for. I'd like to > meet the evil b

Virtual servers mixing up "require"d scripts

2000-05-11 Thread Uri Bernstein
Hi, At my company we're developing a project using mod_perl and Apache::Registry. The project consists of one main script, which "require"s a couple of other scripts and calls functions contained in them. In order to provide a "private" development environment to each of our developers, we defin

RE: Best approach for loading several modules

2000-05-11 Thread Geoffrey Young
> -Original Message- > From: Martin Wood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2000 10:38 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Best approach for loading several modules > > > Thanks for the replies so far all - things are already > becoming clearer. > > > If you ad

Re: Best approach for loading several modules

2000-05-11 Thread Martin Wood
Thanks for the replies so far all - things are already becoming clearer. > If you add a "standard" module to your set, how will it affect > existing apps if they don't directly need it or call it? Why have the > "use" statement at all if that particular module is not being used? So pre-load all

Re: Best approach for loading several modules

2000-05-11 Thread Vivek Khera
> "MW" == Martin Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: MW> Our Apache::Registry CGIs need access to a dozen or so core modules - is MW> there an elegant solution to loading these without seeing a dozen or so use MW> statements at the head of the script? (We have over 100 different CGIs that The "

Re: Best approach for loading several modules

2000-05-11 Thread Jeff Beard
Checkout Apache::RegistryLoader. --Jeff At 02:23 PM 5/11/00, Martin Wood wrote: >Hi there, > >Our Apache::Registry CGIs need access to a dozen or so core modules - is >there an elegant solution to loading these without seeing a dozen or so use >statements at the head of the script? (We have over

Best approach for loading several modules

2000-05-11 Thread Martin Wood
Hi there, Our Apache::Registry CGIs need access to a dozen or so core modules - is there an elegant solution to loading these without seeing a dozen or so use statements at the head of the script? (We have over 100 different CGIs that share a common structure - it would be a nightmare maintaining

Re: Apache::AutoIndex patch

2000-05-11 Thread Ken Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alexei V. Barantsev) wrote: >Dear modperlers! > >I have found that Apache::Autoindex dos not like filenames with >special characters (like space or ?). Such a name should be >uri-escaped. See patch below. This patch is backwards, it should be done the other way around.

Re: hang with $r->internal_redirect

2000-05-11 Thread Ged Haywood
Hi there, On Wed, 10 May 2000, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote: > > I am trying an internal_redirect from a POST with Mason and Apache just > hangs: > Have a look at the Guide, "Caching POSTed Data". 73, Ged.

Apache::AutoIndex patch

2000-05-11 Thread Alexei V. Barantsev
Dear modperlers! I have found that Apache::Autoindex dos not like filenames with special characters (like space or ?). Such a name should be uri-escaped. See patch below. Best wishes, Alexei. (12:05:45) $ diff -u AutoIndex.pm AutoIndex.pm-orig --- AutoIndex.pmThu May 11 12:05:3