Some browsers don't accept cookies sent allong with a redirect header.
A simple workaround is to leave your cookie in the header, but move the
redirect to a META HTTP-EQUIV tag in a blank HTML document.
I'm not sure if IE 6.0 suffers from this but I suspect that this is your
problem. So this
There are different security levels that must be set. You can also specifically
tell the browser to accept
all cookies from a particular domain. There is an article on MS site about
this. I forgot what it was.
You can probably search for it on google.
Frank Wiles wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">
Pedro Melo Cunha wrote:
> Hi,
>
> a bit of history: I read on the documentation the new mod_proxy feature
> called ProxyIOBufferSize which allows for even better handling of lasrge
> mod_perl httpd's. This babby, and another little patch that also made it
> (closing the backend connection as soon
Ok - I got rid of the Apache::Cookie stuff, and am now doing things manually,
but it still doesn't generate a cookie in IE. It still works in Netscape. I
get a redirect, but no cookie. Here is my code:
my $r = Apache->request;
$r->content_type('text/html');
$r->err_headers_out->
I guess in particular, does anyone know of any known issues with
Apache::Cookie and IE6.0 (or any other versions)?
On Saturday 23 March 2002 07:09 pm, Jesse and Rebecca Stay wrote:
> Here is the code I use (in this particular case it is being used with a
> redirect, but it doesn't work in any ca
Hi,
a bit of history: I read on the documentation the new mod_proxy feature
called ProxyIOBufferSize which allows for even better handling of lasrge
mod_perl httpd's. This babby, and another little patch that also made it
(closing the backend connection as soon as possible) allows for me to
have
Here is the code I use (in this particular case it is being used with a
redirect, but it doesn't work in any case.):
my $cookieContent = Apache::Cookie->new(
$r,
-name=> 'userSession',
-value => $cookieValue,
On Sat, 23 Mar 2002 18:52:14 -0500 Jesse and Rebecca Stay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has anyone had any issues in getting cookies to work with IE using mod_perl?
> I have tried using both CGI::Cookie and Apache::Cookie, and in both instances
> it works just fine under Netscape, but on IE it
Hi Ged,
Which Guide? Please advise. Thanks.
John Kolvereid
--- Ged Haywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> On Sat, 23 Mar 2002, John Kolvereid wrote:
>
> >I am trying to install/configure mod_perl. I
> think
> > it is installed but not quite sure.
>
> It's in the
Has anyone had any issues in getting cookies to work with IE using mod_perl?
I have tried using both CGI::Cookie and Apache::Cookie, and in both instances
it works just fine under Netscape, but on IE it doesn't even try to set the
cookie. Any ideas?
-Jesse Stay
Hi there,
On Sat, 23 Mar 2002, John Kolvereid wrote:
>I am trying to install/configure mod_perl. I think
> it is installed but not quite sure.
It's in the Guide. (How do I know if mod_perl is installed?)
> According to the mod_perl Reference Guide the line
> AddModule mod_perl.c
> sh
Hi all,
Wayne Pascoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > [8:37am]# httpd -l
> > Compiled-in modules:
> > http_core.c
> > mod_so.c
> > mod_perl.c
> > suexec: disabled; invalid wrapper /usr/local/apache/bin/suexec
I didn't think I'd been dreaming.
> As a matter of principle, I tend not to mix
> Im curious as to the difference in performance when using perl scripts
with
> Apache::Registry or writing complete Apache Modules in Perl that
conform to
> the API?
Check the list archives for benchmarks by Joshua Chamas. Note that
there are other reasons to use handlers instead of Registry, w
John Von Essen wrote:
> Im curious as to the difference in performance when using perl scripts with
> Apache::Registry or writing complete Apache Modules in Perl that conform to
> the API?
straight mod_perl handlers are faster than Apache::Registry, but they lack some
of the convenience that
Im curious as to the difference in performance when using perl scripts with
Apache::Registry or writing complete Apache Modules in Perl that conform to
the API?
-jve
At 17:30 23.03.2002 +, Jeff wrote:
>Just Curious of Hither Green writes:
>
>So, I am working my way through, and get to page 83 which has a little
>spellette:
>
>sub handler {
> my $r = shift;
> print STDERR $r->as_string();
> return OK;
>}
>
>looks easy peasy - but
>
>1) OK -> Bareword
>
> "OK" is a constant for the HTTP return code 200.
close. OK is 0, which is different from HTTP_OK which is 200.
--Geoff
Jeff wrote:
> Just Curious of Hither Green writes:
>
> I feel like a right tit for asking this...
>
> I already have mod_perl et al running, including my persistent DB connections
> etc etc, but following gourmet cookery advice on this list induced me to
> buy a copy of the mod_perl Dev
> 1) OK -> Bareword "OK" not allowed while "strict subs" in use
>well, that's easy to fix - I must be missing a 'use' [which one??]
>I assume OK is 1 - ie TRUE
"OK" is a constant for the HTTP return code 200. Add:
use Apache::Constants ':common';
to the top of your prog. and
Just Curious of Hither Green writes:
I feel like a right tit for asking this...
I already have mod_perl et al running, including my persistent DB
connections etc etc, but following gourmet cookery advice on this list
induced me to buy a copy of the mod_perl Developers Cookbook... and yes,
my na
Hi,
I am trying to install/configure mod_perl. I think
it is installed but not quite sure. According to the
mod_perl Reference Guide the line
AddModule mod_perl.c
should be added to my httpd.conf, otherwise mod_perl
is not activated. Yet when I include the line and try
to load any page
Wayne Pascoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dave Hodgkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Ged Haywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Something very wrong there. Do you have squeaky clean source trees?
> > > I'd be tempted to erase the lot and start again. What's the compiler?
> > >
At 7:04 PM +0800 3/23/02, Stas Bekman wrote:
>If all you want to do is to be able to load the module only during
>the restart use in startup.pl:
>
> if ($Apache::Server::ReStarting) {
> require "My::Sensitive::Module";
> }
No, the module has to be loaded during both phases, other wise
Ged Haywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Something very wrong there. Do you have squeaky clean source trees?
> I'd be tempted to erase the lot and start again. What's the compiler?
> Post your httpd.conf? Have you built other (older) versions of Apache
> and mod_perl on the same OS?
httpd -l
Hi there,
On 23 Mar 2002, Wayne Pascoe wrote:
> Ged Haywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Have you tried sompiling static instead of DSO?
>
> This is a static build.
Sorry, I've deleted the original message. Why did I think it wasn't?
I must be having a very bad day today.
> if I compil
Kee Hinckley wrote:
> At 4:18 PM -0500 3/22/02, Perrin Harkins wrote:
>
>> Modules loaded with PerlModule and PerlRequire are not supposed to be
>> loaded again the second time. I seem to remember that they are loaded
>> again when using DSO though, so if you're using DSO you may want to
>> r
On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Geoffrey Young wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > We have a full collection of wholesale freight rate calculators at
>
> Aaaahhh!! Ask, anybody, make it stop!!!
Wow. The lusers had actually subscribed that address to be able to
post.
I'll do what I can to make it
On Sat, 16 Mar 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
> To make things thing even more complicated I agree the need of a name
> with a sounding image, which will help mod_perl to grow into corporate
> computing (our future jobs).
>
> Recently I had a discussion with a Java programmer, who said that
At 10:53 PM 3/22/2002, Stas Bekman wrote:
>top and libgtop use the same source of information, so it has nothing to
>do with these tools.
'top' has the ability to display SWAP on a per-process basis (you have to
change the defaults to see it, but it's there).
I didn't find this per-process SWA
Ged Haywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi there,
>
> On 23 Mar 2002, Wayne Pascoe wrote:
>
> > Why does mod_perl need ssl and crypto ? Just curious...
>
> It doesn't. Have you tried sompiling static instead of DSO? There
> have been DSO problems on Solaris (and elsewhere :) in the past bu
Hi again,
Oh, rats, I'm sorry, I shouldn't have sent that. I'm not sure that
it's your 'Options' settings at all. Have you got the right execute
permisions on the directories/files that you're trying to get Apache
to search and/or execute? Have you got anything in the error_log?
By way of fur
Hi there,
On 23 Mar 2002, Wayne Pascoe wrote:
> Why does mod_perl need ssl and crypto ? Just curious...
It doesn't. Have you tried sompiling static instead of DSO? There
have been DSO problems on Solaris (and elsewhere :) in the past but I
thought they were mostly put to bed now.
73,
Ged.
32 matches
Mail list logo
