Re: mod_perl & mod_php

2002-08-29 Thread Iain Truskett
* Jie Gao ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [30 Aug 2002 09:49]: > On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Jesse Erlbaum wrote: [...] > > I notice that you are using mod_perl AND mod_php. > > > > I have a general question for the list: Do people often use BOTH of > > these environments at the same time? It seems to me that there

Re: Filehandles

2002-08-29 Thread Stas Bekman
>>I'm using Perl 5.6 > > > Unless someone with better knowledge pipes up, to the best of my knoweledge > there are threading/concurrancy issues with mod_perl 2 and 5.6.1 ... I know > that Randy has said in places that eventually the officiall recomdendation > for Win32 Apache/mod_perl 2 will

Re: Filehandles

2002-08-29 Thread Stas Bekman
> I think he said mod_perl 2 in his inital post. Which I'm not sure really is > all that swift with concurrant requests under threaded mpms (Win32 is > limited to threaded mpms) ... least nobody seems 100% happy with the > threaded mpm performance of mod_perl 2 yet (Stas? Anybody? How's it > l

Re: Redirecting through proxy

2002-08-29 Thread Ask Bjoern Hansen
On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Abd El-Hamid Mohammed wrote: > RewriteEngine on > RewriteRule ^/abc(.*) http://abc.use-trade.com:8080$1 [P] > ProxyPass /abc/ http://abc.use-trade.com:8080/ > ProxyPassReverse /abc/ http://abc.use-trade.com:8080/ > > and it works great for redirecting http://www.mydomain.co

Re: Filehandles

2002-08-29 Thread Randy Kobes
On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Justin Luster wrote: > The stress tool that I'm using is from Microsoft and is a free download. It > is called Web Application Stress. There is a setting in this tool called > Concurrent Connections (threads). As I mentioned before I am able to do > this no problem under r

Re: base.pm seems to fail a check

2002-08-29 Thread Stas Bekman
Stefano wrote: > Hello, > > I was not able to find anything similar in list archives, > > Trying to : > > use base Ima::DBI > > in mod_perl (also in a block of config) > a cought this trace: > > Uncaught exception from user code: > Can't locate DBI/db.pm in @INC (@INC contains:

RE: mod_perl & mod_php

2002-08-29 Thread Jesse Erlbaum
Hey Andy -- > I'm using both at work because we're slowly migrating from PHP to Perl. That reminds me of a project I started last year. We were charged with assuming responsibility for a website built on ColdFusion. We moved the site from Solaris/Netscape-Commerce to Linux/Apache-mod_perl. Ev

Re: mod_perl & mod_php

2002-08-29 Thread Iain Truskett
* Andy Lester ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [30 Aug 2002 10:33]: [...] > PHP is better than Perl in some cases, I've found. If you're > predominantly templating and don't want to futz around with Mason or > TT or whatever, PHP will do a fine job. I'm naturally biased toward Perl, and generally the PHP I'v

Re: mod_perl & mod_php

2002-08-29 Thread Andy Lester
> I have a general question for the list: Do people often use BOTH of these > environments at the same time? It seems to me that there would be little > benefit to using both. Am I mistaken? I'm using both at work because we're slowly migrating from PHP to Perl. PHP is better than Perl in som

Re: mod_perl & mod_php

2002-08-29 Thread Ufuk Yuzereroglu
I just HAVE to use it since I am moving and already working environemtn to a new platform. I would neither use both if I were given the chance Ufuk - Original Message - From: "Jesse Erlbaum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 4:47 PM Subject: mod_

Re: mod_perl & mod_php

2002-08-29 Thread Jie Gao
On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Jesse Erlbaum wrote: > > Well what you said is true. I actuallay had perl 5.6.1 but I > > tried to use an > > old httpd executable compiled with 5.6.0. Adding directories to @INC would > > help me but each time before I would start httpd, I'd have to do that. > > Instead I re

mod_perl & mod_php

2002-08-29 Thread Jesse Erlbaum
Hi Ufuk -- > Well what you said is true. I actuallay had perl 5.6.1 but I > tried to use an > old httpd executable compiled with 5.6.0. Adding directories to @INC would > help me but each time before I would start httpd, I'd have to do that. > Instead I recompiled mod_perl/apache/ssl/php bundle.

Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: HTML::Template 2.6

2002-08-29 Thread simran
Excellent... can't wait to try it out... thanks Sam. ps: You did not mention anything about adding filter args support... i though that you were going to put in some sort of a feature to support filter arguments (for which Cees sent a patch...) - is this still on the agenda? On Sat, 2002-08-3

Re: @INC

2002-08-29 Thread Ufuk Yuzereroglu
Well what you said is true. I actuallay had perl 5.6.1 but I tried to use an old httpd executable compiled with 5.6.0. Adding directories to @INC would help me but each time before I would start httpd, I'd have to do that. Instead I recompiled mod_perl/apache/ssl/php bundle. And that helped (for s

RE: @INC

2002-08-29 Thread Jesse Erlbaum
Hi Darren -- > Can't you use the perl startup file to re-write the INC array? > > I thought I'd seen a post along those lines a while back. Sure you can. I use PERL5LIB and an "unshift(@INC, ...)" all the time to push an extra path at server startup. However, that's just the tip of Ufuk's pro

RE: @INC

2002-08-29 Thread Darren Ward
Can't you use the perl startup file to re-write the INC array? I thought I'd seen a post along those lines a while back. Darren -Original Message- From: Jesse Erlbaum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, 30 August 2002 6:29 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: @INC Hi Ufuk -- >H

modperl 1.27 blues

2002-08-29 Thread Jeff Chen
Hi, I recently ran into a problem which has puzzled me about Perl compilation and installation. I would appreciate some help in understanding this. I run Redhat 7.2, which comes with perl-5.6.0-17. I was able to compile and install 5.6.1 and 5.8.0 all seemingly without problems. However, I ran

Re: Filehandles

2002-08-29 Thread Perrin Harkins
Chris wrote: > I think he said mod_perl 2 in his inital post. Oops, you're right, I totally missed that. Sorry Justin. - Perrin

Re: Filehandles

2002-08-29 Thread Chris
> Justin Luster wrote: >> The stress tool that I'm using is from Microsoft and is a free >> download. > > That isn't quite what I asked. Which version of mod_perl are you > using? > >> There is a setting in this tool called >> Concurrent Connections (threads). > > Regardless, mod_perl 1.x does

ANNOUNCEMENT: HTML::Template::Expr 0.04

2002-08-29 Thread Sam Tregar
CHANGES - Fixed parser to recognize negative numbers. Thanks to Fran Fabrizio for the report. - Fixed parser to allow for HTML-comment style tags. Thanks to Stuhlpfarrer Gerhard for the spot. - Updated mailing-list information to reflect move from vm.com to sourceforge.net DESCRIPTION

ANNOUNCEMENT: HTML::Template::JIT 0.04

2002-08-29 Thread Sam Tregar
CHANGES - Added support for HTML::Template 2.6's new DEFAULT attribute. - Added support for HTML::Template 2.6's new __counter__ variable. - Updated mailing-list information to reflect move from vm.com to sourceforge.net - Fixed bug where tmpl_var's with the escape attribute would cause a

ANNOUNCEMENT: HTML::Template 2.6

2002-08-29 Thread Sam Tregar
CHANGES - New Feature: HTML::Template will combine HTML_TEMPLATE_ROOT environment variable and path option if both are available. (Jesse Erlbaum) - New Feature: __counter__ variable now available when loop_context_vars is set (Simran Ga

Re: Filehandles

2002-08-29 Thread Perrin Harkins
Justin Luster wrote: > The stress tool that I'm using is from Microsoft and is a free download. That isn't quite what I asked. Which version of mod_perl are you using? > There is a setting in this tool called > Concurrent Connections (threads). Regardless, mod_perl 1.x does not support multipl

Re: Filehandles

2002-08-29 Thread Chris
Didn't mean to take this off list if I had. Heh. > I'm using Perl 5.6 Unless someone with better knowledge pipes up, to the best of my knoweledge there are threading/concurrancy issues with mod_perl 2 and 5.6.1 ... I know that Randy has said in places that eventually the officiall recomdendat

Re: Filehandles

2002-08-29 Thread Justin Luster
The stress tool that I'm using is from Microsoft and is a free download. It is called Web Application Stress. There is a setting in this tool called Concurrent Connections (threads). As I mentioned before I am able to do this no problem under regular CGI with 10 concurrent users but when I run

Re: Filehandles

2002-08-29 Thread Perrin Harkins
Justin Luster wrote: > The load tester that I'm using works fine with my script outside of > mod_perl. Does it work when running them concurrently under CGI? > When multiple concurrent users began hitting the script under mod_perl, > using Apache::Registry or Apache::RunPerl all heck breaks loos

Re: Filehandles

2002-08-29 Thread Perrin Harkins
Chris wrote: > XP is based on the NT Kernel, and should have a working flock. I believe In > recent versions of 5.6.1 flock() is emulated on the 9x kernel as well. > However this doesn't mean mod_perl supports it It does actually, since mod_perl is Perl. Thanks for the flock clarification. -

Re: Filehandles

2002-08-29 Thread Chris
> Thanks for responding so quickly. > > flock does work under Windows 2000 and above. > > The load tester that I'm using works fine with my script outside of > mod_perl. My script works inside of mod_perl with only one concurrent > user. When multiple concurrent users began hitting the script u

RE: @INC

2002-08-29 Thread Jesse Erlbaum
Hi Ufuk -- >How can I have @INC array contain the directory names > /usr/lib/perl/5.6.1 ... instead of /usr/lib/5.6.0. > Apache does not run beacuse of the value of @INC. You need to recompile Apache/mod_perl. -Jesse-

Re: Filehandles

2002-08-29 Thread Chris
> Personally I would suspect Windows in this case. I don't know about > XP, but Windows 95/98/ME did not have a working flock. If XP is based > on the NT code, it may not have that problem. Even so, I would try > testing that first, or maybe asking about it on Win32 perl mailing > list. XP

@INC

2002-08-29 Thread Ufuk Yuzereroglu
How can I have @INC array contain the directory names /usr/lib/perl/5.6.1 ... instead of /usr/lib/5.6.0. Apache does not run beacuse of the value of @INC.   UY

Re: Filehandles

2002-08-29 Thread Justin Luster
Thanks for responding so quickly. flock does work under Windows 2000 and above. The load tester that I'm using works fine with my script outside of mod_perl. My script works inside of mod_perl with only one concurrent user. When multiple concurrent users began hitting the script under mod_perl,

Re: Filehandles

2002-08-29 Thread Perrin Harkins
Justin Luster wrote: > Does anyone know anything about flock and mod_perl? Yes. There is no problem with flock and mod_perl. However, if you were to open a filehandle in startup.pl and then use that same filehandle after forking, that could be a problem. Personally I would suspect Windows in

Re: Redirecting through proxy

2002-08-29 Thread Igor Sysoev
On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Abd El-Hamid Mohammed wrote: >Anybody can tell me how to redirect > http://www.mydomain.com/abc To http://abc.mydomain.com:8080 > > I had used the following > > RewriteEngine on > RewriteRule ^/abc(.*) http://abc.use-trade.com:8080$1 [P] > ProxyPass /abc/ http://abc.u

Re: [mp-1.99_05] segfault modperl_pcw.c:52 ap_pcw_walk_files_config dconf->sec_file is NULL

2002-08-29 Thread Phil Lobbes
Hi Doug, You asked: > which one is NULL dconf or dconf->sec_file? if dconf->sec_file > should never be NULL. i'm not sure if it is possible for dconf > itself to be NULL. do you have some example configuration that > causes the problem? Well, dconf was NOT NULL, but sec_file was NULL: (gdb)

Redirecting through proxy

2002-08-29 Thread Abd El-Hamid Mohammed
Hi, Anybody can tell me how to redirect http://www.mydomain.com/abc To http://abc.mydomain.com:8080 I had used the following RewriteEngine on RewriteRule ^/abc(.*) http://abc.use-trade.com:8080$1 [P] ProxyPass /abc/ http://abc.use-trade.com:8080/ ProxyPassReverse /abc/ http://abc.use-trade.

Re: Segmentation Fault with mod_php and mod_perl

2002-08-29 Thread Alex Lee
Doug and Stas, I try to compile PHP with largefile support with no luck so I follow Doug's advice and rebuild mod_perl with PERL_USELARGEFILES=0. This solves the problem. Thanks a lot for helping me out! Alex >From: Doug MacEachern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: Alex Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >CC

Filehandles

2002-08-29 Thread Justin Luster
I'm using mod_perl 2.0 and Apache::Registry on a Windows XP machine.  I'm using a load tester to test my Perl CGI program.  I'm reading and writing to files and I'm using flock to control collisions.  I keep getting an error when the load tester is going (5 concurrent users).  It seems that

RE: base.pm seems to fail a check

2002-08-29 Thread Jesse Erlbaum
Hi Stefano -- > Working outside mod_perl (i.e. in a command line perl program) no > problem jumps out because the above arrowed 'die' correctly matches > its regexp (the exception message starts at the beginning of the line). > > From inside mod_perl we have an unmatch so base croaks with the com

base.pm seems to fail a check

2002-08-29 Thread Stefano
Hello, I was not able to find anything similar in list archives, Trying to : use base Ima::DBI in mod_perl (also in a block of config) a cought this trace: Uncaught exception from user code: Can't locate DBI/db.pm in @INC (@INC contains: [...] This happens because Ima::DBI

Re: bivio and mod_perl

2002-08-29 Thread Rob Nagler
zt.zamosc.tpsa.pl writes: > Do many mod_perl programmers use bOP by bivio.biz in their large projects? At least 3. :-) We have a few downloads, but I doubt anybody is using it for anything serious besides us. (Others, please correct me if I'm wrong.) > Could you share with your experience at

RE: modifying @INC at startup and version of perl used

2002-08-29 Thread Jesse Erlbaum
Hi Jamie -- > So are you forced to use the version of perl that was chosen when > mod_perl was installed? Guess so, am trying to do a local > non-root install of apache and mod_perl to see if this is so. Yes -- you are bound to use the version of Perl which was compiled into Apache. If you wan

RE: modifying @INC at startup and version of perl used

2002-08-29 Thread Jamie . Echlin
Actually I was in the process of reading your very useful piece on how to create a non-root install. Problem is, there is a hell of a lot of FM to read. anyway, ta >-Original Message- >From: Stas Bekman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: 29 August 2002 12:01 >To: Echlin, Jamie >Cc: [EMAIL

Re: modifying @INC at startup and version of perl used

2002-08-29 Thread Stas Bekman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] > So are you forced to use the version of perl that was chosen when > mod_perl was installed? Guess so, am trying to do a local non-root > install of apache and mod_perl to see if this is so. It helps to RTFM: http://perl.apache.org/docs/1.0/guide/install.html#

RE: modifying @INC at startup and version of perl used

2002-08-29 Thread Jamie . Echlin
Thanks, but, didn't think i was a beginner... this is more of a mod_perl question because I'm aware of how to set @INC etc for normal perl scripts. Anyway I tried your advice, but, from perldoc perlvar: $] The use of this variable is deprecated and for $^V: Use of uninitialized value at blah.

Re: modifying @INC at startup and version of perl used

2002-08-29 Thread mmaunder
Jamie, Use the perl internal variables to figure out what version you're running under: $] and $^V Use these whether you're running perl or mod_perl. You might want to direct questions relating to perl in general to the perl beginners list. Please see perldoc perlvar for more details. ~mark.

modifying @INC at startup and version of perl used

2002-08-29 Thread Jamie . Echlin
Hi, This is probably a luser error as I am quite new to this malarkey, however I have been experimenting for a while without progress now. I need to know how to find out exactly which version of perl mod_perl is configured to use, and if this can be changed as a non-root user, and how to set t