Re: Apache Hello World Benchmarks Updated

2002-10-14 Thread Ed
Hi, (as far as i can tell after a quick peek at the code and some debugging) It looks like there is a bug w/ AxKit::run_axkit_engine() and/or Apache::AxKit::Cache::_get_stats() run_axkit_engine() wants to create a .gzip cachefile when AxGzipOutput is off. When AxGzipOutput is off the .gzip fil

Re: Apache Hello World Benchmarks Updated

2002-10-14 Thread Dave Rolsky
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Josh Chamas wrote: > This is interesting. I should look into upgrading to perl 5.8 on > these tests & see what difference there may be. > > You might also see if it makes a difference if you run the tests for > a long enough time. I run them at least 60 seconds for these be

Re: Apache Hello World Benchmarks Updated

2002-10-14 Thread Josh Chamas
Dave Rolsky wrote: > > I'm fairly sure, FWIW, that Mason does not have any memory leaks, as of > 1.12. Pre-1.10 versions do have a _very_ slow memory leak, and 1.10 and > 1.11 had that leak plus another, much nastier one. > Yes, Mason seemed pretty free of leaks when I tested it more today too

Re: Apache Hello World Benchmarks Updated

2002-10-14 Thread Josh Chamas
Perrin Harkins wrote: > Josh Chamas wrote: > >> Set MaxRequestsPerChild to 100 for applications that seem to leak >> memory which include Embperl 2.0, HTML::Mason, and Template Toolkit. >> This is a more typical setting in a mod_perl type application that >> leaks memory, so should be fai

Re: Apache Hello World Benchmarks Updated

2002-10-14 Thread Dave Rolsky
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Perrin Harkins wrote: > Josh Chamas wrote: > > > Set MaxRequestsPerChild to 100 for applications that seem to leak > > memory which include Embperl 2.0, HTML::Mason, and Template Toolkit. > > This is a more typical setting in a mod_perl type application that > > leaks

Re: Apache Hello World Benchmarks Updated

2002-10-14 Thread Perrin Harkins
Josh Chamas wrote: > Set MaxRequestsPerChild to 100 for applications that seem to leak > memory which include Embperl 2.0, HTML::Mason, and Template Toolkit. > This is a more typical setting in a mod_perl type application that > leaks memory, so should be fairly representative benchmark s

Re: Segfaults when using XML::Parser

2002-10-14 Thread David Castro
Thanks. I found that I was using a custom apache build without that enabled, but it is fixed now with a newer apache RPM for redhat. Thanks again. On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Bruno Connelly wrote: > David> If you have some of the processes segfault when using > David> XML::Parser you

Trouble Compiling Mod_Perl 1.27 on SGI

2002-10-14 Thread Kent, Mr. John
Greetings, Having trouble building mod_perl-1.27 against Apache_1.3.27 on an SGI Gettting: Will run tests as User: 'webuser' Group: 'webgroup' (cd ../apache_1.3.27 && CC="cc -n32" CFLAGS=" -D_BSD_TYPES -D_BSD_TIME -woff 1184 1552 -OPT:Olimit=0:space=ON -I/usr/local/include -DLANGUAGE_C" ./confi

Re: Segfaults when using XML::Parser

2002-10-14 Thread Bruno Connelly
David>If you have some of the processes segfault when using David>XML::Parser you should use David>--disable-rule=EXPAT David>during the Apache configuration step. David> David>Starting from mod_perl version 1.23 this option is David>

Re: Segfaults when using XML::Parser

2002-10-14 Thread David Castro
I have found this section under the "Warnings and Errors Troubleshooting" on the web site. It states: If you have some of the processes segfault when using XML::Parser you should use --disable-rule=EXPAT during the Apache configuration step. Starting

Re: migrating from Apache to iPlanet; any mod_perl counterpart? [FOUND?]

2002-10-14 Thread Paul
I just got this note from Dennis, and it looks like (at first cursory glance) *EXACTLY* what I wanted (God bless you Dennis! =o) I forward it to the list for the benefit of others that might find it helpful in similar situations. I have removed Dennis' email address and phone number, in case he

Apache::Clean mod_perl 2.0 port

2002-10-14 Thread Geoffrey Young
hi all... I had a few moments so I've started to port Apache::Clean over to mod_perl 2.0. it's far from complete, and I haven't examined all the issues with proper caching headers yet, but you can find the work in progress here: http://www.modperlcookbook.org/~geoff/modules/experimental/A

RE: Apache::DBI and CGI::Application with lots of modules.

2002-10-14 Thread Jesse Erlbaum
Hey Eric -- > I wanted the DBH to be global since just about every sub in Holds does a > query of some sort. I guess it doesn't matter either way if I do > the connect > in the new() vs up top outside of a sub. CGI::Application has a facility which is intended to solve exactly this type of prob

[ANNOUNCE] Apache::ASP v2.45 released

2002-10-14 Thread Josh Chamas
Hey, Apache::ASP v2.45 is released to CPAN. This is a fairly large release with some new features, performance enhancements & bug fixes. Please see the change log below. For more information about Apache::ASP, please see the web site at: http://www.apache-asp.org Regards, Josh ___

Re: [cgiapp] Re: Apache::DBI and CGI::Application with lots of modules.

2002-10-14 Thread William McKee
On 14 Oct 2002 at 9:12, Eric Frazier wrote: > That I am not so sure of. I will do some more investigation. It seems like > the only variables that could be causing this are the result set from the > query and the scalar which holds the html template. I feel like I know > absolutly nothing now :(

Re: Apache::DBI and CGI::Application with lots of modules. (fwd)

2002-10-14 Thread Rafiq Ismail
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Eric Frazier wrote: > >That looks like voodoo code copied from a man page. If you call this as > >Holds->new(), you don't need that junk about ref. (And most people > >recommend against the "new Holds" syntax.) > > I wanted the DBH to be global since just about every sub in

Re: Apache::DBI and CGI::Application with lots of modules.

2002-10-14 Thread Rafiq Ismail
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Eric Frazier wrote: > >That looks like voodoo code copied from a man page. If you call this as > >Holds->new(), you don't need that junk about ref. (And most people > >recommend against the "new Holds" syntax.) > > I wanted the DBH to be global since just about every sub in

Re: Apache::DBI and CGI::Application with lots of modules.

2002-10-14 Thread Perrin Harkins
Eric Frazier wrote: > I wanted the DBH to be global since just about every sub in Holds does a > query of some sort. Three options: 1) Pass it to every sub 2) Make a utility sub that returns a dbh and call it from each sub. (Sounds like you already made one of these.) 3) Stuff it in $r->pnotes()

Re: Apache::DBI and CGI::Application with lots of modules.

2002-10-14 Thread Eric Frazier
Perrin, I am starting to feel guilty about bugging you so much, but you are the only person to have responded, and I watch the list enough to value your advice quite a bit. >>sub new { >>my $invocant = shift; >>my $class = ref($invocant) || $invocant; >> > >That

Re: Apache::DBI and CGI::Application with lots of modules.

2002-10-14 Thread Eric Frazier
At 11:58 AM 10/14/02 -0400, Perrin Harkins wrote: >Eric Frazier wrote: >> Here is the kind of thing that is driving me nuts. Please see: >> http://perl.apache.org/docs/general/perl_reference/perl_reference.html#Remed >> ies_for_Inner_Subroutines >> >> If what this says is true, then either I don

Re: Apache::DBI and CGI::Application with lots of modules.

2002-10-14 Thread Perrin Harkins
Eric Frazier wrote: > Here is the kind of thing that is driving me nuts. Please see: > http://perl.apache.org/docs/general/perl_reference/perl_reference.html#Remed > ies_for_Inner_Subroutines > > If what this says is true, then either I don't have a closure type problem, > or else what is says i

Re: [Very, VERY OT] Re: [Mason] ANNOUNCE: Mason 1.15

2002-10-14 Thread Paul
> > > Dave, just interesting. What does "ginsu knives" means :? > > throw in a set of free ginsu knives (think sushi) for people who > > would buy some crap on the TV shopping program. > We have this kind of TV ads on German TV now, too. Badly dubbed. So > badly it's getting worth watching if you

[Very OT] Re: [Mason] ANNOUNCE: Mason 1.15

2002-10-14 Thread Lupe Christoph
On Monday, 2002-10-14 at 13:26:19 +0200, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote: > On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 11:50:09AM +0400, Oleg Bartunov wrote: > > On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Dave Rolsky wrote: > > Dave, just interesting. What does "ginsu knives" means :? > If you haven't had prolonged exposure to US TV you c

Re: Does Apache::NavBar exist ?

2002-10-14 Thread Lincoln Stein
That's right. CPAN is telling you to contact Doug and Me. Lincoln Does it exist ? > > > > Weird, it doesn't show up on search.cpan.org, but it seems to be on CPAN > > still: http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/B/BA/BARRACODE/ > > Otherwise you can find a copy here: > > http://modperl.com:9000/book/s

Re: [Mason] ANNOUNCE: Mason 1.15

2002-10-14 Thread Louis-David Mitterrand
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 11:50:09AM +0400, Oleg Bartunov wrote: > On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Dave Rolsky wrote: > > > > > Eventually, we'll fork the code base again and start breaking things in > > preparation for an eventual 1.20 (or maybe some other version number cause > > we might get to 1.20 just b

Re: Does Apache::NavBar exist ?

2002-10-14 Thread Lupe Christoph
On Monday, 2002-10-14 at 12:10:33 +0200, Per Einar Ellefsen wrote: > At 12:01 14.10.2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >I've just been perusing the docs on perl.apache.com and in the "Cute > >Tricks" > >section there is mention of a module called Apache::NavBar being available > >from > >CPAN. I

Re: Does Apache::NavBar exist ?

2002-10-14 Thread Per Einar Ellefsen
At 12:01 14.10.2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Hi > >I've just been perusing the docs on perl.apache.com and in the "Cute Tricks" >section there is mention of a module called Apache::NavBar being available >from >CPAN. I may be blind but I can't find it. Does it exist ? Hi Paul, Weird, it does

Does Apache::NavBar exist ?

2002-10-14 Thread paul . barker
Hi I've just been perusing the docs on perl.apache.com and in the "Cute Tricks" section there is mention of a module called Apache::NavBar being available from CPAN. I may be blind but I can't find it. Does it exist ? Regards Paul

Re: [Mason] ANNOUNCE: Mason 1.15

2002-10-14 Thread Oleg Bartunov
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Dave Rolsky wrote: > > Eventually, we'll fork the code base again and start breaking things in > preparation for an eventual 1.20 (or maybe some other version number cause > we might get to 1.20 just by small bugfix/doc/performance releases), which > will incorporate new feat