On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, Sam Tregar wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, Tom Brown wrote:
>
> > ?? AFAIK, Files opened in append mode, and written to without buffering,
> > should _not_ get corrupted in any manner that flock would prevent.
> > (basically small writes should be
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 12:57:52PM +0200, Carlo Giomini - tesista Federico wrote:
> > > 2. If this risk exists, I should procede with the old installation BUT
> > > what would I get at the end? Mod_perl statically built inside Apache?
> > Build what you want and install it. I wouldn't worry about
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 12:20:41PM +0200, Carlo Giomini - tesista Federico wrote:
> I can't manage very well with Apache and mod_perl. I have made an
> installation of mod_perl WITHOUT building a new httpd daemon (NO_HTTPD=1),
> undergoing all the steps until the end (perl MAKEFILE_PL, make, make
Is the webserver useful if you have an error that warrants sending a
mail? If sending an email means the server is broken having a flood of
mails may be a feature. It will be incentive to fix whatever is
breaking your server/db.
Also, I would strongly recommend keeping your warning system as simpl
On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, Bill Marrs wrote:
>
> >It's copy-on-write. The swap is a write-to-disk.
> >There's no such thing as sharing memory between one process on disk(/swap)
> >and another in memory.
>
> agreed. What's interesting is that if I turn swap off and back on again,
what? doesn't se
> No, I can't explain the nitty gritty either. :-)
>
> Someone should write up a summary of this thread and ask in a
> technical linux place, or maybe ask Dean Gaudet.
I believe this is a linux/perl issue... stand alone daemons exhibit the
same behaviour... e.g. if you've got a parent PERL daemo
By 'compiled code ... just like that in Java' do you mean byte code?
You may want to look at
http://perlmonks.org/index.pl?lastnode_id=864&node_id=76685
which I found by searching for 'compiled' at perlmonks.org.
Your client is making a strange request. Most people put a higher
value on source co
better, someone has written a makerpm.pl script which will build a .spec
file for an RPM, from which you can build .src.rpm or .i386.rpm files...
there is a version out there that works with rpm4, I won't post the it
here in the hopes that someone who is maintaining a version _will_ speak
up... b
> >
> > "mod_perl: 20 billion hits served"
> > And turn the "m" into a stylized arch. :)
>
> LOL!! Way to go, Randal!
>
> Or how about a play on the old Superman line?
> A graphic with O'Reilly's Eagle and a caption like
>
> "Look! Up on the net! It's a bird! It's a plane!
> No, it'swait,
> >
> > > This is a general Unix webserver issue and not specific to
> > > mod_perl, so I've marked your message [OT] for off-topic.
> >
> > Well, workarounds are available for specific webserver environments, so I
> > don't believe it's an inappropriate question.
> >
> > With CGI, you use the
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Pierre Phaneuf wrote:
> Pierre Phaneuf wrote:
>
> Does anyone has an idea about this? I think I have proper behavior from
> my perl handler by installing it at the root of the server, but this is
> no real solution!
>
> What I am doing wrong here???
>
> > I'm really stumpe
On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Andrew Ho wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The other day we had a system fail because the partition that holds the
> logs became full, and Apache stopped responding to requests. Deleting some
> old log files in that partition solved the problem.
>
> We pipe logs to cronolog (http://www.
>
> Yes, yes, yes it was a bad suggestion. Sorry about that.
> I still didn't complete this section, looking for a clean solution to find
> a way to close only the fd that keeps the socket busy.
> So far you can use the closing fds in loop -- at least it works.
yuck... you'd either have to find
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Tom Brown wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Ajit Deshpande wrote:
> > > 2. The POD for Apache::Registry says that it doesn't like __END__ and
> > > __DATA__ tokens. So what affect do these actually have if left in? Does
>
> In scripts? i
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Ajit Deshpande wrote:
> > 2. The POD for Apache::Registry says that it doesn't like __END__ and
> > __DATA__ tokens. So what affect do these actually have if left in? Does
In scripts? it's a syntax error, but that's a completely separate issue
from modules which get used "a
On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, J. J. Horner wrote:
>
> > If I'm way off base, please let me know. I'm spending considerable
> > brain power on this idea and if I'm wasting it, I need to know. I
> > don't have much spare brain power and I could use it to try to f
On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, Ben Thompson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 09:32:41AM -0800, brian moseley wrote:
> >
> > if you really feel the need to compete with php in the
> > lowest tier web app space, you need to make simplicity your
> > #1 goal. php is awesome entry level technology, and i almost
On Sat, 28 Oct 2000, martin langhoff wrote:
> Chris,
>
> i'd bet my head a few months ago someone announced an apache::bench
> module, that would take a log and run it as a benchmarking secuence of
> HTTP requests. just get to the list archives and start searching with
I wrote a simple pe
On Sat, 28 Oct 2000, G.W. Haywood wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> On Sat, 28 Oct 2000, Jerrad Pierce wrote:
>
> > Is anybody using GzipChain?
>
> IIRC, Josh said he was. He didn't complain about it. Raved, in fact.
>
> > Is there some known means of verifying that it is in fact working properly?
>
Interesting, the Mason bug report I just filed is obviously mis-filed.
Apache::Registry scripts suffer the same behaviour.
On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Dave Rolsky wrote:
> Try the following handler:
>
> package Foo;
>
> use Apache::Request;
>
> sub handler
> {
> my $r = shift;
>
> my (@va
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Bakki Kudva wrote:
> I recently upgraded to perl5.6 and added php4 to my apache server. I
> don't know what I did wrong but I am getting the following errors.
> If I do a httpd -l I get...
>
> suexec: disabled; invalid wrapper /usr/local/apache/bin/suexec
your copy of suexe
t request
Conn Kilobytes transferred this connection
ChildMegabytes transferred this child
Slot Total megabytes transferred this slot
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2000 11:43:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tom Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Proxy s
On Fri, 28 Jul 2000, Paul J. Lucas wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jul 2000, Denton River wrote:
>
> > Its been a long time since i have done a jobb without using sessions. I would
> > really like to have this feature included in the kit im using and i think
> > alot of developers are with me on this one.
>
On Sun, 16 Jul 2000, Barry Hoggard wrote:
> Nothing is wrong with that solution if you only have a few domains.
> We own a lot of misspellings of our company name, so I don't want to
> add each of them individually to the conf file.
double that count... since you also nicely solved the proble
first off, David Hodgkinson's comments are correct... Stas's guide is very
thorough, and covers pretty much all of this.
On Mon, 3 Jul 2000, Nigel Hamilton wrote:
> Hi,
> I've been trying to setup mod_perl in an Apache/Red Hat
> Linux/mySQL environment for the last couple of weeks.
>
On Tue, 20 Jun 2000, Joshua Chamas wrote:
> > your machine. Therefore you should configure the server, so that the
> > maximum number of possible processes will be small enough using the
> > C directive. This will ensure that at the peak hours the
> > system won't swap. Remember that swap space i
On Mon, 17 Apr 2000, Ime Smits wrote:
> | Also, my system has cgiexec (does suid for CGI scripts) installed. The
> | cgiexec documentation says that once cgiexec is installed, it is a
> | security risk if people can execute code as "nobody" since that user has
> | special access to the cgiexec co
> Also, my system has cgiexec (does suid for CGI scripts) installed. The
> cgiexec documentation says that once cgiexec is installed, it is a
> security risk if people can execute code as "nobody" since that user has
> special access to the cgiexec code. Right now, anyone can execute code as
> nob
> >
> >I'm reading between the lines here, but it sounds like you are trying to
> >have _one_ parent apache daemon that services _everything_ on the machine
> >(likely _more_ than one website), which would imply that you are going to
> >have an _extremely_ low hit ratio on your mod_perl scripts.
>
On Wed, 12 Apr 2000, Jesse Wolfe wrote:
> I am working with www.superb.net to get their mod_perl up and working
> again. They have great infrastrucure, lots of great tools, and an amazing
> price.
> They had apache/mod_perl for awhile, and upgrades broke it. I expect they
> will have it in a wee
On Mon, 31 Jan 2000, BeerBong wrote:
> Hello all!
>
> I need encrypted access to some directories on some virtual hosts.
>
> I have lightweight proxy apache server and backend mod_perl server.
>
> mod_ssl is not a light thing, and I need encrypt mod_perl'd script results
> only, therefore I th
On Thu, 25 Nov 1999, Robert Locke wrote:
>
> I actually commented out the "exit" line below that and let it
> continue as if there were no error.
>
> Then, when I ran "make", I discovered the actual error, which in my
> case involved not having gdbm properly installed.
here's the fix
[root@qm
On 5 Oct 1999, Chip Turner wrote:
> Tom Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > great ideas... I'm reading that man page now... It does match the symptom,
> > but it's gotta be corruption or an external module that we didn't write,
> > since I'
Anyone seen anything like this?
running modperl 1.21 on linux with a work around for the corrupted PATH
environment variable issue... perl 5.004_05 ...
This code:
open( MAIL, "| $MAILER" ) || die "can't open $MAILER";
print MAIL <<"EOM";
HELO localhost
ONEX
MAIL FROM: $from
EOM
foreach
34 matches
Mail list logo
