On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 07:42:11AM -0400, Paul Cotter wrote:
> Does a package exist that will read an HTML document and generate an
>Apache::Registry cgi script? Even better if it accepts an
randal s. posted a way to do that
sometime back. search for it in
the archive. his stonehenge
website apparently uses the same trick.
On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 02:51:14PM -0400, Richard Chen wrote:
> I would like to customize or suppress the Server header
> from the modperl server responses such
that's no apache::registry. that's perl
there are big guns here who can answer
your questions but it am not one of them.
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 02:25:17PM -0700, Eric Kolve wrote:
> I found something a bit curious that I was wondering if someone could
> explain. I have the following apache::
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 10:02:06AM -0400, Brendan McAdams wrote:
Our application performance actually
> improved across the board when we implements MaxRequests... (This
Do you have numbers to back this up? How does reading in a new
script every now and then IMPROVE anything compared to keep
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 07:19:25PM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
> > if I set say MaxRequestsPerChild 1 ??
>
> Not if you preload your scripts at the server startup. But then you pay
> the price of the time to spawn a new process, which has a very little
> overhead under low load since Apache prefor
Thanks. I think that is what I really need :)
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 08:19:21PM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
> the two events contrudict and lead to the need to re-read the guide, and
> especially this section:
> http://perl.apache.org/guide/performance.html#Preloading_Registry_Scripts_at_S
>
> :
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 12:10:01PM +0100, G.W. Haywood wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> On Wed, 25 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > like to know whether there is a compilation overhead if I set say
> > MaxRequestsPerChild 1 ??
>
> http://perl.apache.org/guide
I have read the "guide" cover to cove
I recently began to experience many lingering
mod_perl processes which slow down my tcp connection.
I use Apache::Registry for all my mod_perl need.
Not the "real" handler.
The practical solution I found was to cut down the
number MaxRequestPerChild and kill off the processes
after a few reques
Stead of DSO why don't you compile
statically.
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 02:47:55PM -0700, Mod-Perl List wrote:
>
>
> I am trying to build mod_perl 1.25 as a DSO on Solaris 2.7
> and when I execute perl Makefile.PL, it says I will probably
> get core dumps and to upgrade to perl 5.6. I am running
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 09:58:41PM +, Richard wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Dec 2000, you wrote:
> > Screw the tests. Mine fails all the time, I just type 'make install' and it
> > all works perfectly.
>
> Hmn, just tried that.
>
> my httpd.conf file did not seem to change, i setup a directive for
>
On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 10:37:16AM -0800, Joshua Chamas wrote:
>
> Please feel free to run the tests yourself, and if you give
> me the results, I'll be sure to post them at a later date
> at http://www.chamas.com/bench/ . You can grab the benchmarks
> from http://www.chamas.com/bench/hello.tar
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 02:53:30PM -0800, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
> >>>>> "newsreader" == newsreader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> newsreader> Maybe he meant php hello world vs perl hello world?
>
> And the point of such a comparison
Maybe he meant php hello world vs perl hello world?
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 01:16:59PM -0800, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
> > "Jimi" == Jimi Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Jimi> Does anyone have any mod_perl vs. mod_php benchmarks?
>
> Perl code gets 0 performance on PHP.
> PHP cod
On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 10:14:56PM -0800, Joshua Chamas wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Could you please explain the differences between
> > CGI Raw and CGI.pm? I'm using oo method of
> > CGI.
> The Raw CGI test makes no use of CGI.pm, just issues raw print
> statements that sets up
Could you please explain the differences between
CGI Raw and CGI.pm? I'm using oo method of
CGI.
Thanks
On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 07:56:03PM -0800, Joshua Chamas wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Updated results from the other day with the Template Toolkit
> benchmark properly optimized, thanks Perrin!
>
I'm also interested in this problem. I've
been piping my mails to sendmail and I'm
told that this is not a good idea with mod_perl.
I find that talking to SMTP server is noticeably
slower although I don't know whether the slowness is
just in the initial connection. I am using the local
sendmail d
The output I get is
used memory = 0
used memory = 0
used memory = 0
used memory = 0
used memory = 0
I'm interested in how many leaks are possible in mod_perl
though because my mod_perl processes are getting bigger
with time -- about 200 requests is making the process
fatter by 1mb on the aver
They say mod_perl 1.24_01 (not 1.24) is to be used with apache 1.3.14
On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 04:02:42PM -0600, Wang, Pin-Chieh wrote:
> I am trying to build apache v.1.3.14 with Mod_perl v. 1.24 using APACI
> I am using Perl 5.6 build 620 - the latest
>
> I ran perl Makefile.PL under mod_perl-1
It's not enough to just install the modules.
Did you configure the httpd.conf with mod_perl
as explained in the documentation?
On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 03:40:45PM -0200, Edmar Edilton da Silva wrote:
> Hi all,
> I have installed on my machine the following modules:
> apache 1.3.12-2
Actucally 'file' has always been '/full/path/to/file' because
my path in most of my scripts are empty and
I have the taintcheck on. Besides they were working under
mod_perl for a full week.
It's weird that I can now make them work by converting every dbmopen to tie.
It seems that perl sudd
Hi People
I have this mysterious problem of my mod_perl scripts
giving errors like no such file or directory
when I know for a fact that files and directory are there.
The files are berkeley db file. The problems first show
up in the midst of doing multiple recompiling and reinstallation
of mo
21 matches
Mail list logo
