On Wed, 26 Apr 2000, Geoffrey Young wrote:
> good morning...
>
> I'm a bit confused about $r->set_handlers and $r->push_handlers behavior.
> Both are listed in the eagle book as being per-request methods, but man
> Apache lists them both as server configuration directives. I think, though,
> th
nal Message-
> From: Matt Sergeant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2000 11:17 AM
> To: Geoffrey Young
> Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Re: $r->set_handlers behavior?
>
>
> On Wed, 26 Apr 2000, Geoffrey Young wrote:
>
&g
On Wed, 26 Apr 2000, Geoffrey Young wrote:
> good morning...
>
> I'm a bit confused about $r->set_handlers and $r->push_handlers behavior.
> Both are listed in the eagle book as being per-request methods, but man
> Apache lists them both as server configuration directives. I think, though,
> th
good morning...
I'm a bit confused about $r->set_handlers and $r->push_handlers behavior.
Both are listed in the eagle book as being per-request methods, but man
Apache lists them both as server configuration directives. I think, though,
that I'm seeing set_handlers as persisting with the child
