On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> The alternative of course it to just plug them both
> together - AxKit and Mason play nicely together using
> Apache::Filter (though it's a bit slow).
with version 2.3 of the java servlet api, you can now create
input and output filters, just like the
On 23 Apr 2001, Michael Alan Dorman wrote:
> Well I will say that you made an excellent point that hadn't really
> occured to me---I use XML + XSL for a lot of stuff (the DTD I use for
> my resume is a deeply reworked version of one I believe you had posted
> at one time), but not web sites, in p
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Ian Kallen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mason and AxKit solve different but related problems. The former a
> code-aware component system with process semantics that lend itself to
> easily scoping a component's applicability, the latter a
> transformation engine. It would b
Michael Alan Dorman wrote:
> Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > It depends a *lot* on the type of content on your site. The above
> > www.dorado.com is brochureware, so it's not likely to need to be
> > re-styled for lighter browsers, or WebTV, or WAP, or... etc. So your
> > content (I
Mason and AxKit solve different but related problems. The former a
code-aware component system with process semantics that lend itself to
easily scoping a component's applicability, the latter a transformation
engine. It would be nice to see a framework published that uses the best
of both (sor
Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It depends a *lot* on the type of content on your site. The above
> www.dorado.com is brochureware, so it's not likely to need to be
> re-styled for lighter browsers, or WebTV, or WAP, or... etc. So your
> content (I'm guessing) is pure HTML, with Mason
On 23 Apr 2001, Michael Alan Dorman wrote:
> Errr, respectfully, I think you underestimate Mason's capabilities.
Not really. I've researched Mason quite a bit, and I talk with Jon every
ApacheCon/OSSCON about how we can bring together the Mason and AxKit
synergy. Now Jon has been to my talk, we
Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The one thing I think AxKit does really well, that other
> "templating" solutions aren't really designed for, is allowing you
> to build your whole web site with that solution. So for example,
> Mason and EmbPerl are really great for building the dynamic
On Sat, 21 Apr 2001, Joachim Zobel wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> I try to understand why and if this XML/XSL stuff is useful. Is it that
> transformations (XSL) of XML to HTML can be used instead of the usual HTML
> templates (eg. Template-Toolkit)?
Partly. But XSLT is also able to transform documents, wh
Hi.
I try to understand why and if this XML/XSL stuff is useful. Is it that
transformations (XSL) of XML to HTML can be used instead of the usual HTML
templates (eg. Template-Toolkit)? Can this do what a template engine can
do? Where are the limitations? Is there something it can't do?
Than
10 matches
Mail list logo
