Debugging information sent to browser

2001-01-12 Thread J. J. Horner
Is something available to allow debugging information to be sent to a browser based on the UID of the user or IP address of the client? We use cgiwrap (and consequently, cgiwrapd) to help secure our server and I like the option of using cgiwrapd when a problem is encountered.

Re: Debugging information sent to browser

2001-01-12 Thread Blue Lang
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, J. J. Horner wrote: Is something available to allow debugging information to be sent to a browser based on the UID of the user or IP address of the client? This sounds like a hack job for Carp.. I assume you mean uid of the cgi-wrapped user? I'm also toying with the

Re: Debugging information sent to browser

2001-01-12 Thread J. J. Horner
* Blue Lang ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010112 12:08]: On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, J. J. Horner wrote: I'm also toying with the idea of allowing each script to have a DEBUG=1 option enabled in a handler so that as long as it is the script owner, verified by uid, trying to set the DEBUG=1 parameter in

Re: Debugging information sent to browser

2001-01-12 Thread Todd Finney
At 12:07 PM 1/12/01, Blue Lang wrote: On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, J. J. Horner wrote: I'm also toying with the idea of allowing each script to have a DEBUG=1 option enabled in a handler so that as long as it is the script owner, verified by uid, trying to set the DEBUG=1 parameter in a URL,

Re: Debugging information sent to browser

2001-01-12 Thread J. J. Horner
* Todd Finney ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010112 13:00]: At 12:07 PM 1/12/01, Blue Lang wrote: On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, J. J. Horner wrote: I'm also toying with the idea of allowing each script to have a DEBUG=1 option enabled in a handler so that as long as it is the script owner, verified

Re: Debugging information sent to browser

2001-01-12 Thread George Sanderson
Why do you think it would be hard to return AUTH_REQUIRED if the DEBUG=1 param is in the URL? Granted, the browser issues involved won't make it the best solution, but no worse than passwords are already. Someone would have to be using a machine where a valid uid/passwd are in browser cache,