Hi again,
On Sat, 10 Nov 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> since my active server page knowledge is pretty much zero here is my
> issue. Have several clients that use IIS w/lots of ASP[yuk] instead
> of Apache && all things PERL.
Richard and Josh have answered your other points, but I'd just like
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> hi,
>How far along is mod perl ASP? IOW just how compatible is it to the
> proprietary equiv? Reason being is that i would love to offer it to clients
> that use the m$ one transparently. That way they get what they want if
> that is what they want and i get what
> THX for the response. To clarify since my active server page
> knowledge is pretty
> much zero here is my issue.
I'm afraid that what you want to do probably isn't possible.
I will try to teach you something about the architecture of ASP on IIS,
and how it differs from Apache::ASP.
In
> hi,
THX for the response. To clarify since my active server page
knowledge is pretty
much zero here is my issue. Have several clients that use IIS w/lots of
ASP[yuk]
instead of Apache && all things PERL.
However really don't know if their websites would suddenly look different
if one wer
Hi there,
On Sat, 10 Nov 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> How far along is mod perl ASP? IOW just how compatible is it to the
> proprietary equiv?
I'm not quite sure what you mean. Be aware that Apache::ASP is purely
for scripting in Perl. I have used it on a system which now has a
very large
hi,
How far along is mod perl ASP? IOW just how compatible is it to the
proprietary equiv? Reason being is that i would love to offer it to clients
that use the m$ one transparently. That way they get what they want if
that is what they want and i get what i want. Namely to continue to use
mod
