Stas Bekman wrote:
>
> > Nothing really to add here, except that since this seems to be a FAQ,
> > perhaps Stas would be willing to add a section about it that we could
> > just point to whenever this question comes up? A non-partisan page with
> > a focus on similarities and links to each site w
> Nothing really to add here, except that since this seems to be a FAQ,
> perhaps Stas would be willing to add a section about it that we could
> just point to whenever this question comes up? A non-partisan page with
> a focus on similarities and links to each site would be ideal.
Hmm, I hardly
Nothing really to add here, except that since this seems to be a FAQ,
perhaps Stas would be willing to add a section about it that we could
just point to whenever this question comes up? A non-partisan page with
a focus on similarities and links to each site would be ideal.
At 12:39 AM 2/14/00 -0
>
> Well, I haven't used Embperl but I've read the docs a bit and I have some
> idea of how it works.
>
> One big difference that I would point out is that despite its name
> HTML::Mason, is _much_ less HTML centric than Embperl. It is a bit
> mod_perl centric but there is literally nothing HTML
At 15:17 14-2-2000 -0600, Autarch wrote:
>On Mon, 14 Feb 2000, Gerald Richter wrote:
>
> > > all. We've been talking recently about how to expand mason so that
> it can
> > > be used in any sort of context where you have a request (from STDIN,
> > > email, whatever) for content that you want fil
On Mon, 14 Feb 2000, Gerald Richter wrote:
> > all. We've been talking recently about how to expand mason so that it can
> > be used in any sort of context where you have a request (from STDIN,
> > email, whatever) for content that you want filled by components.
>
> While you are talking, Embpe
> One big difference that I would point out is that despite its name
> HTML::Mason, is _much_ less HTML centric than Embperl. It is a bit
> mod_perl centric but there is literally nothing HTML specific about it at
> all. We've been talking recently about how to expand mason so that it can
> be u
On Mon, 14 Feb 2000, Andre Landwehr wrote:
> I made some pages with Embperl, but I don't know Mason. Yesterday
> a friend told me of Mason, but he does not know Embperl very
> well. Now I wonder about the pros and cons of each, not only in
> respect to performance but also general usability, bugs
hi,
my ignorance on Embperl is about to show;-)) tell me
what would one be looking at to write apps for say the
casios and Pilot 5s in linux? will embedded perl work?
is it the right choice? this to map to web technologies
of course:-))
Regards,
Andre Landwehr wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I made some pages with Embperl, but I don't know Mason. Yesterday
> a friend told me of Mason, but he does not know Embperl very
> well. Now I wonder about the pros and cons of each, not only in
> respect to performance but also general usability, bugs etc.
> What
Hi,
> I made some pages with Embperl, but I don't know Mason. Yesterday
> a friend told me of Mason, but he does not know Embperl very
> well. Now I wonder about the pros and cons of each, not only in
> respect to performance but also general usability, bugs etc.
> What do more experienced web pro
11 matches
Mail list logo
