On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Dave Rolsky wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Andrew Ho wrote:
>
>> One last thing that is hard is where is your DocumentRoot? This is a huge
>> problem for web applications being installable "out of the box." Perl
>> can't necessarily figure that out by itself, either.
>
> You ta
Mark Maunder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was thinking that too, but then I remembered that if you're not from an IT
> background, you're probably not going to be able to write a line of mod_perl
> code anyhoo.
No, but you can pick up Mason, embperl, or Apache::Template (the TT
loaded into Ap
Rod Butcher wrote:
> My .05... I run a small communal webserver. Software had to be free, secure,
> stable, support Perl, multiple domains and ASP, be reasonably simple,
> originally run on Win32 and be capable of migration to Linux later.
> Nobrainer -- Apache, mod_perl, Apache::ASP.
> Only diff
On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Andrew Ho wrote:
> One last thing that is hard is where is your DocumentRoot? This is a huge
> problem for web applications being installable "out of the box." Perl
> can't necessarily figure that out by itself, either.
You take a guess and then ask the user to confirm. And
On Sat, 2 Feb 2002, Robin Berjon wrote:
> http://www.securityspace.com/s_survey/data/man.200201/apachemods.html?mod=cGVybA==
>
> For some reason, in December, it would seem that modperl just jumped ahead in
> market share (from 13% to nearly 20%). [...]
At least on Netcraft big jumps are usual
Hello,
JH>I've found it possible to dispense with a separate configuration file
JH>for almost any application, even those with an RDBMS back-end. Under
JH>*nix it's really easy to automate things, under Win32 it's a little more
JH>difficult (file permissions are a bastard to manipulate). Perl can
My .05... I run a small communal webserver. Software had to be free, secure,
stable, support Perl, multiple domains and ASP, be reasonably simple,
originally run on Win32 and be capable of migration to Linux later.
Nobrainer -- Apache, mod_perl, Apache::ASP.
Only difficulty was getting mod_perl in
:: - Install Apache and mod_perl, or use an existing installation.
::
:: - Install all the needed modules, template files, images, etc.
[cut]
Dave,
I too try to automate installations as much as possible. Within Perl,
I've found it possible to dispense with a separate configuration file
for a
Dave Rolsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 4 Feb 2002, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
>
> > And if the Slashcode were as easy to install and customise as
> > phpnuke...
>
> For OSCON (and hopefully YAPC too), I've submitted a talk on using
> Module::Build (an ExtUtils::MakeMaker replacement) for modu
Many cobalt boxes come running mod_perl by default. perhaps if people have
been deploying a lot of these things lately it could have made an impact.
HEAD / HTTP/1.0
HTTP/1.1 302 Found
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2002 20:13:54 GMT
Server: Apache/1.3.12 Cobalt (Unix) mod_jk mod_ssl/2.6.4 OpenSSL/0.9.5a
P
On 4 Feb 2002, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
> And if the Slashcode were as easy to install and customise as
> phpnuke...
For OSCON (and hopefully YAPC too), I've submitted a talk on using
Module::Build (an ExtUtils::MakeMaker replacement) for modules and using
it to build an application installer.
It
___cliff rayman___ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> one more guess - in the group of guesses. ;-)
>
> perhaps redhat or another popular distro is
> configuring standard with mod_perl (i use
> redhat, but i always hand select my packages).
> if this is the case, then the banner will show mod_perl,
>
one more guess - in the group of guesses. ;-)
perhaps redhat or another popular distro is
configuring standard with mod_perl (i use
redhat, but i always hand select my packages).
if this is the case, then the banner will show mod_perl,
even if the user has no idea what it is, and it
is not in use
On Saturday 02 February 2002 23:20, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> Wow, bizarre. Not sure why but the AxKit list has seen a massive spurt in
> traffic lately too. Perhaps due to the migration to xml.apache.org (well,
> just a link at the moment), but perhaps due to the above?
Traffic is notoriously hard
Paul DuBois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At 11:02 + 2/3/02, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
> >Paul DuBois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> Mac OS X includes Apache, and mod_perl works there, too. That's
> >> another group of potential new mod_perl-ized servers.
> >
> >I think all the recent R
Paul DuBois wrote:
> > I think all the recent RedHats come with mod_perl as a
> > DSO by default.
>
> I just looked on a RH 7.2 machine. It has the AddModule
> line in the default httpd.conf, but no mod_perl.so in the
> modules directory.
I think the DSO in a separate mod_perl RPM package.
--
At 11:02 + 2/3/02, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
>Paul DuBois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Mac OS X includes Apache, and mod_perl works there, too. That's
>> another group of potential new mod_perl-ized servers.
>
>I think all the recent RedHats come with mod_perl as a DSO by default.
I just
Paul DuBois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Mac OS X includes Apache, and mod_perl works there, too. That's
> another group of potential new mod_perl-ized servers.
I think all the recent RedHats come with mod_perl as a DSO by default.
--
Dave Hodgkinson, Wizard for Hire http://www.dav
At 20:54 -0200 2/2/02, Jorge Godoy wrote:
>Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Wow, bizarre. Not sure why but the AxKit list has seen a massive spurt in
>> traffic lately too. Perhaps due to the migration to xml.apache.org (well,
>> just a link at the moment), but perhaps due to the
Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> However I'm always skeptical of such massive changes - perhaps more likely
> is a change in SecuritySpace's methodology?
Don't Netcraft keep numbers?
--
Dave Hodgkinson, Wizard for Hire http://www.davehodgkinson.com
Editor-in-chief, The Highw
Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Wow, bizarre. Not sure why but the AxKit list has seen a massive spurt in
> traffic lately too. Perhaps due to the migration to xml.apache.org (well,
> just a link at the moment), but perhaps due to the above?
>
> However I'm always skeptical of such ma
On Sat, 2 Feb 2002, Robin Berjon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I thought that some of you might find this graph interesting:
>
> http://www.securityspace.com/s_survey/data/man.200201/apachemods.html?mod=cGVybA==
>
> For some reason, in December, it would seem that modperl just jumped ahead in
> market share (
22 matches
Mail list logo
