Re: Persistent Net::Telnet Objects in Apache2/mod_perl2

2002-07-15 Thread Stas Bekman
French, Shawn wrote: > Stas Bekman wrote: > >>It seems that you are after the same functionality as Apache::DBI, you >>want a pool of items that you want to be able to choose from. >>Look for threads::shared (perl 5.8.0), just create a shared hash with >>keys that you use for the map and the v

RE: Persistent Net::Telnet Objects in Apache2/mod_perl2

2002-07-15 Thread French, Shawn
Stas Bekman wrote: > It seems that you are after the same functionality as Apache::DBI, you > want a pool of items that you want to be able to choose from. > Look for threads::shared (perl 5.8.0), just create a shared hash with > keys that you use for the map and the values for the actual conn

Re: Persistent Net::Telnet Objects in Apache2/mod_perl2

2002-07-15 Thread Stas Bekman
French, Shawn wrote: > Hey everyone, > > It's me again... the persistent telnet mod_perl newbie! > (http://msgs.securepoint.com/cgi-bin/get/apache0205/204.html) > > I have implemented my project using persistent telnet connections (one for > each user session accessible throught the session to p

Re: Persistent Net::Telnet Objects

2002-05-31 Thread Perrin Harkins
French, Shawn wrote: > Recall that I am using: Apache/1.3.20 (Win32) mod_perl/1.25_01-dev > mod_ssl/2.8.4 OpenSSL/0.9.6a on Windows 2000 with PHP 4.21 > > Would this be why my scripts are working? Mystery solved! Yes, that's why. You are running mod_perl in single process mode because you're

Re: Persistent Net::Telnet Objects

2002-05-30 Thread Keith G. Murphy
"French, Shawn" wrote: > > I just found this: http://www.devshed.com/Talk/Books/ProApache/page2.html > > "On Windows platforms, Apache does not fork; consequently, the directives > for controlling the number of processes or their lifetime have no effect. > Instead, Apache runs as a multi-threade

RE: Persistent Net::Telnet Objects

2002-05-30 Thread Jim Helm
ns' > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Persistent Net::Telnet Objects > > > Perrin wrote: > > I can't see how it could be working now > > That makes two of us! > > > You're probably opening new telnet connections from each apache > >

RE: Persistent Net::Telnet Objects

2002-05-30 Thread French, Shawn
I just found this: http://www.devshed.com/Talk/Books/ProApache/page2.html "On Windows platforms, Apache does not fork; consequently, the directives for controlling the number of processes or their lifetime have no effect. Instead, Apache runs as a multi-threaded process" Recall that I am using:

Re: Persistent Net::Telnet Objects

2002-05-29 Thread Medi Montaseri
Perhaps you can put a System V message Queue in front of both Telnet connections, this way producers can place their messages in the queue asynchronously , and the backend (consumer) can pick them up in a FIFO. Also, try using Net::SSH::Perl. The Net::Telnet does not give your things like STDOUT,

Re: Persistent Net::Telnet Objects

2002-05-29 Thread Rob Mueller (fastmail)
Our project needed persistent socket connections open as well. There is supposed to be a standard mechanism to pass file descriptors between unix processes, though it's bugginess level depends on your OS. There is a perl module for this called Socket::PassAccessRights. So what you can do is create

RE: Persistent Net::Telnet Objects

2002-05-29 Thread mod_perl
Maybe you can tell us more about the project (e.g. why telnet ?) so there will come many bad advices ? :-) Peter Bi > Perrin wrote: > > I can't see how it could be working now > > That makes two of us! > > > You're probably opening new telnet connections from each apache process. > > I know

RE: Persistent Net::Telnet Objects

2002-05-29 Thread French, Shawn
Perrin wrote: > I can't see how it could be working now That makes two of us! > You're probably opening new telnet connections from each apache process. I know that I am not since they are continuing to log to the same dump file, and my code (as stated in previous message) simply goes to the ha

Re: Persistent Net::Telnet Objects

2002-05-29 Thread Perrin Harkins
French, Shawn wrote: > Although this is working right now, I don't know enough [ anything? :) ] > about Apache or mod_perl to be sure that this will work in the future. I can't see how it could be working now, unless it is actually creating a new Telnet object on every request. Your %sessionHas